On 2/2/10 7:19 PM, Richard Kenner wrote:
I see that what I need is an assignment for all future changes. If my
employer is not involved with any contributions of mine, the employer
disclaimer is not needed, right ?
It's safest to have it. The best way to prove that your employer is
not in
> I see that what I need is an assignment for all future changes. If my
> employer is not involved with any contributions of mine, the employer
> disclaimer is not needed, right ?
It's safest to have it. The best way to prove that your employer is
not involved with any contributions of yours is w
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 01:26 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
[...]
> As I see the issue, you should first check over the next months that the
> feature is not deprecated by ISO.
I know, I tried to talk about it on std.c++. I am afraid I can not see
a consens
Jon writes:
> Is there a way to get collect2 to save the temporary .c file it
> generates to have a look at it? I believe it may be the __main()
> function, with the -debug option it gives the attached
> gplusplus_collect2_log.txt, looking at the [/tmp/ccyBAI9V.c] file
> though it is empty, any i
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20100202 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20100202/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Rainer Orth wrote:
> * The guide is far from complete: e.g., the libstdc++ configure options
> are missing completely (they are documented in the XML/HTML manual,
> but there's not even a pointer to that in the installation guide). I
I noted that issue at least as far bac
Hi Ian, Thank you for your reply.
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Jon Grant writes:
I see that some of the files are located in the -L library directory
specified, crtbegin.o, crtend.o in which case, perhaps they both do
not need their full long path specified.
Most linkers do not use the -L path t
Rainer Orth writes:
> I don't want this to be merely a rant, so I plan next to revise the
> specific instructions for my targets and then try and come up with a
> suggestion for a clearer structure for the configuration chapter, though
> I fear that much of this will be 4.6 material. After askin
While preparing a revision of the sections in `Installing GCC' relevant
to my platforms, I've just read it front-to-back and found a couple of
problems I'd like to discuss before starting to develop patches.
* As a general note, many sections describe mechanism (which configure
options are avail
Does Modulo Scheduling work on x86 platforms? I have tried adding in
various versions of the -fmodulo-sched option and get the exact same
output with or without. The application is a very simplistic matrix
multiply without dependencies.
Thank you,
Cameron Palmer
On 01/29/2010 08:56 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hey!
With my last patch, we only have 3 instances of dominator tree walks
left in the tree, all in the TM ipa pass.
I believe we can leave those as they are, since the TM ipa pass runs
early enough that nothing has altered control flow such that
cod
On 2 February 2010 08:26, Christian Fröbel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having a hard time figuring out how exactly pthread_cancel() works
> in a C++ program. It seems that a thread cancellation is somewhat
> similar to throwing an exception. But I couldn't find any proof or
> details about it. I'm not
Hi all,
I'm having a hard time figuring out how exactly pthread_cancel() works
in a C++ program. It seems that a thread cancellation is somewhat
similar to throwing an exception. But I couldn't find any proof or
details about it. I'm not even sure this topic is gcc-relevant but
hope someone can li
13 matches
Mail list logo
