Successful make profiledbootstrap of GCC 4.4.2 on Snow Leopard 10.6.2 x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0

2009-12-16 Thread Olexa Bilaniuk
This is to report a successful build of GCC 4.4.2 on my laptop. ./config.guess: i386-apple-darwin10.2.0 gcc -v: Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.2/configure --prefix=/Users/*/Documents/MyApps/Commands/GCC/MacOSX --with-pkgversion="GNU GCC 4

[034/151] x86: Prevent GCC 4.4.x (pentium-mmx et al) function prologue wreckage

2009-12-16 Thread Greg KH
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Thomas Gleixner commit 746357d6a526d6da9d89a2ec645b28406e959c2e upstream. When the kernel is compiled with -pg for tracing GCC 4.4.x inserts stack alignment of a function _before_ the mcount

Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2

2009-12-16 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote: > I've actually searched but still can't find any mention of such bugs/patches. > > If anybody remembers a key word I could use, that would help. I've > tried "4.3.2" or "GMP" but haven't found anything. I have tried a search on bugs

Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2

2009-12-16 Thread Jean Christophe Beyler
I've actually searched but still can't find any mention of such bugs/patches. If anybody remembers a key word I could use, that would help. I've tried "4.3.2" or "GMP" but haven't found anything. Thanks a lot, Jc On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at

Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2

2009-12-16 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote: > Dear all, > > Found on http://gmplib.org/. > > "N.B. gcc 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP 4.3.x on 64-bit machines. The problem > is specific to that very release; specifically gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 > seem to work fine." > > Since porting to a ne

GMP and GCC 4.3.2

2009-12-16 Thread Jean Christophe Beyler
Dear all, Found on http://gmplib.org/. "N.B. gcc 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP 4.3.x on 64-bit machines. The problem is specific to that very release; specifically gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 seem to work fine." Since porting to a newer version is difficult for me right now, I was wondering if anybody worked on

Re: updated code size comparison

2009-12-16 Thread John Regehr
Moreover, aggregating those boolean results to yield things like "X generated larger code than Y NN% of the time" seems even weirder. Is this really useful information, other than for marketing? Hi Miles- Did you click through to one of the pages that shows a rank-ordered list of functions wh

Please update GNU GCC mirror list

2009-12-16 Thread JohnT
Some of the sites listed on the mirror list http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html aren't up to date and some aren't accessible. LaffeyComputer.com doesn't allow access, and used to require a password for access. This isn't the way a GNU mirror site ought to operate. There should be free public acces

Re: updated code size comparison

2009-12-16 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 12/16/2009 03:21 AM, John Regehr wrote: Hopefully the results are more fair and useful now. Again, feedback is appreciated. I would also avoid testcases using volatile. Smaller code on these testcases is often a sign of miscompilation rather than optimization. For example, http://embed.