Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:29:29 -0800 Justin Mattock
wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure how to handle this,
while compiling firefox-3.6b1.source
I get this with the default compiling options,
as well as custom:
...
active_anon:2360492kB inactive_anon:590196kB active_file:84kB
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:29:29 -0800 Justin Mattock
wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm not sure how to handle this,
> while compiling firefox-3.6b1.source
> I get this with the default compiling options,
> as well as custom:
>
> ...
>
> active_anon:2360492kB inactive_anon:590196kB active_file:84kB
2.8GB of an
C:\devel\gccnew\gcc>gccmvs -DUSE_MEMMGR -Os -S -ansi -pedantic-errors -DHAVE_CON
FIG_H -DIN_GCC -DPUREISO -I ../../pdos/pdpclib -I . -I config/i370 -I
../include
varasm.c
(insn 117 429 118 7 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 64)
(compare:SI (mem/s:BLK (plus:SI (reg/f:SI
I can't really tell how that's different from the patch I posted.
It looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Roland
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote:
> That is correct. This is to avoid command lines that are too large. We
> currently delete those files during the plugin cleanup. I will send a
> patch disabling cleanup if -debug is given.
-save-temps will also keep the files around which
sable-multilib --enable-lto --enable-plugins
--enable-maintainer-mode --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --no-create
--no-recursion
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 20091103 (experimental) (GCC)
COMPILER_PATH=/usr/local/libexec/gcc-trunk/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/:/usr/local/libexec/gcc-trun
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:06 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] so that we
> can build both ld and gold. This patch will
>
> 1. Install ld as ld.bfd
> 2. Install gold as ld.gold
> 3. Install one of them as ld, selected by --with-linker.
>
> If n
> Hello,
> I'm not sure how to handle this,
> while compiling firefox-3.6b1.source
> I get this with the default compiling options,
> as well as custom:
>
>
> [ 532.942324] cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0,
> oom_adj=0
> [ 532.942330] Pid: 16002, comm: cc1plus Tainted: P
>
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> --with is wrong for this. It's not about the ambient system built against.
> It's a feature selection for how you build binutils, which means --enable.
>
Here is the updated patch.
--
H.J.
2009-11-03 Roland McGrath
H.J. Lu
--with is wrong for this. It's not about the ambient system built against.
It's a feature selection for how you build binutils, which means --enable.
> But with the above details, how can I figure out how to run gdb, ie what
> arguments to give to gdb --args?
This is an area that needs some improvement :-(
What I do is pass -Wl,-debug to gcc. That will make collect2 print the
call to ld. Add a -plugin-opt=-debug to it and it should print the
ca
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20091103 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20091103/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Jean Christophe Beyler writes:
> I've been working on handling the Debugging information for the use of
> GDB on my port. Though I definitely know that, when compiling in -O3,
> some information is lost and the debugger can't always have all the
> information, I'd like to at least keep the values
Dear all,
I've been working on handling the Debugging information for the use of
GDB on my port. Though I definitely know that, when compiling in -O3,
some information is lost and the debugger can't always have all the
information, I'd like to at least keep the values of the arguments
when doing a
I will try to add more details about my issue. Another way of putting this is :
For my architecture there is:
- A certain number of input registers which allow calls without going
on the stack
- There is not automatically a frame pointer on the stack either
What is needed, from the GCC side, to
Hi All,
Our project is to optimize instruction scheduling in gcc by detecting
structural hazards. We are trying to understand the two instruction
scheduling passes(pass_sched and pass_sched2) and have the following doubts
regarding the same. We are currently looking at schedule_insns() meth
Hi All,
Our project is to optimize instruction scheduling in gcc by detecting
structural hazards. We are trying to understand the two instruction
scheduling passes(pass_sched and pass_sched2) and have the following doubts
regarding the same. We are currently looking at schedule_insns() meth
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure how to handle this,
while compiling firefox-3.6b1.source
I get this with the default compiling options,
as well as custom:
[ 532.942324] cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
[ 532.942330] Pid: 16002, comm: cc1plus Tainted:
Hi All,
Our project is to optimize instruction scheduling in gcc by detecting
structural hazards. We are trying to understand the two instruction
scheduling passes(pass_sched and pass_sched2) and have the following doubts
regarding the same. We are currently looking at schedule_insns() meth
ddmetro writes:
> 1. We are expecting that pass_sched and pass_sched2, each will enter
> schedule_insns() function once per pass. However, we found that it is
> entering schedule_insns() function per function(in the program) per pass.
> (If there are two functions in the input program, pass_sched
On 11/03/09 09:29, Ian Bolton wrote:
Hi again, Vladimir,
I am pleased to report some performance improvements after altering
ira-costs.c. A key benchmark for us has improved by 5%.
Specifically, in record_reg_classes(), after the alt_cost has been
calculated and it will be applied to pp->mem_c
Hi All,
Our project is to optimize instruction scheduling in gcc by detecting
structural hazards. We are trying to understand the two instruction
scheduling passes(pass_sched and pass_sched2) and have the following doubts
regarding the same. We are currently looking at schedule_insns() meth
Hi All,
Our project is to optimize instruction scheduling in gcc by detecting
structural hazards. We are trying to understand the two instruction
scheduling passes(pass_sched and pass_sched2) and have the following doubts
regarding the same. We are currently looking at schedule_insns() meth
Hi All,
Our project is to optimize instruction scheduling in gcc by detecting
structural hazards. We are trying to understand the two instruction
scheduling passes(pass_sched and pass_sched2) and have the following doubts
regarding the same. We are currently looking at schedule_insns() meth
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Jon Beniston wrote:
>> The port is ok to check in.
>
> Great - so can I apply it, or does someone else need to?
Until you have write access to the repository, someone else needs to
commit the patch for you.
The GCC community generally likes to see a few examples
Hi again, Vladimir,
I am pleased to report some performance improvements after altering
ira-costs.c. A key benchmark for us has improved by 5%.
Specifically, in record_reg_classes(), after the alt_cost has been
calculated and it will be applied to pp->mem_cost and pp->cost[k], I
check whether th
26 matches
Mail list logo
