Re: dg-error vs. i18n?

2009-10-24 Thread Dave Korn
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> The testsuite should run with C locale. > > Unfortunately it appears there are now some systems where C no longer > implies ASCII, causing problems for predictability of output. I was asked about this on another list

Re: dg-error vs. i18n?

2009-10-24 Thread Charles Wilson
Andreas Schwab wrote: > Dave Korn writes: > >> I'll check. Joseph's suggestion sounds likely: I think Cygwin just >> switched >> to use lots of UTF-8 internally, so I might well need to specify an encoding >> as well. (Sorry for not being as well educated in this field as I really >> ought to

Re: dg-error vs. i18n?

2009-10-24 Thread Andreas Schwab
Dave Korn writes: > I'll check. Joseph's suggestion sounds likely: I think Cygwin just switched > to use lots of UTF-8 internally, so I might well need to specify an encoding > as well. (Sorry for not being as well educated in this field as I really > ought to be by now.) If cygwin wants to

Re: dg-error vs. i18n?

2009-10-24 Thread Andreas Schwab
Andrew Pinski writes: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Dave Korn > wrote: >> >>    Hi everyone, >> >>  Sorry for posting a dumb question, but it's not my strongest area: now that >> cygwin is handling i18n and unicode and "all that stuff", I started seeing a >> whole slew of test failures, e.g

Re: Error when building cross compiler

2009-10-24 Thread Denis Onischenko
The error is also reproduced with gcc 4.5 revision 153504

Re: Error when building cross compiler

2009-10-24 Thread Denis Onischenko
>> There is something peculiar going on, because a >> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu hosted compiler would not normally refer to >> libgcc_s.so.1 at all. Even if it did, nothing would normally direct >> the dynamic linker to look in the gcc build directory. Something is >> wrong but I don't know what i

Re: Duplicate GCC warnings

2009-10-24 Thread Dave Korn
Ralf Corsépius wrote: > I am observing this behavior with > * all linux->rtems4.9/newlib (gcc-4.3.2/newlib-1.16.x) cross gccs > * all linux->rtems4.10/newlib (gcc-4.4.2/newlib-1.17.x) cross gccs > * linux->cygwin/newlib cross gccs (gcc 3.4.4; built from cygwin sources) > > I am not observing this