gcc mirror in Bangalore, India

2009-10-02 Thread Vineet Dwivedi
Hi, We have hosted gcc mirror at the following location http://mirror.vocabbuilder.net/gnu/gcc/ Request you to include this in your list of mirrors. My contact details are in the signature below. Regards Vineet VINEET DWIVEDI DIRECTOR, VOCAB BUILDER +91-80-4213-4193 (d) | +91-990-291

Re: [lto] Committed doc feedback and c++ fixes to branch

2009-10-02 Thread Diego Novillo
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 18:16, Richard Guenther wrote: > Done.  If all goes well I think we should merge - waiting even more > doesn't really add to the quality and it just takes extra ressources > to work on the branch. I agree. I'd like to get started with the stage3 fixes next week. I will w

Inline assembly operand specification

2009-10-02 Thread Zoltán Kócsi
Is there a documentation of the various magic letters that you can apply to an operand in inline assembly? What I mean is this: asm volatile ( " some_insn %X[operand] \n" : [operand] "=r" (expr) ); What I look for is documentation of 'X'. In particular, when (expr) is a multi-register objec

Re: i370 port - constructing compile script

2009-10-02 Thread Paul Edwards
Hi Ian, thanks for your reply. 1. First I need to use my current build machine, Linux, to first of all convert the i370.md into insn*.c files, then generate an xgcc. The xgcc would be capable of producing i370 code so long as I use the "-S" option. It doesn't really matter how this xgcc was cr

Re: [lto] Committed doc feedback and c++ fixes to branch

2009-10-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Diego Novillo wrote: > > I have committed today's round of feedback to the branch.  It incorporates > richi's fixes for C++ and enables LTO testing on builtins.exp (which is > interesting for LTO as it includes multiple files) > > I am still not sure whether I will do the fin

Re: arm-elf multilib issues

2009-10-02 Thread Samuel Tardieu
> "Paul" == Paul Brook writes: Paul> IMHO building lots of multilibs by default significantly increases Paul> toolchain size and build time for little actual benefit. ARM CPUs Paul> are generally backwards compatible and we only have one important Paul> ABI variant, so very few multilibs are

Re: i370 port - constructing compile script

2009-10-02 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Paul Edwards" writes: > 1. First I need to use my current build machine, Linux, > to first of all convert the i370.md into insn*.c files, then > generate an xgcc. The xgcc would be capable of producing > i370 code so long as I use the "-S" option. It doesn't really > matter how this xgcc was c

Re: [LTO] Request for testing: Last merge from trunk before final merge

2009-10-02 Thread Rainer Orth
Diego Novillo writes: > If anyone has free cycles I would appreciate results from other > ELF-capable targets. In addition to the issues already reported for Solaris 11/SPARC, here are the findings for Solaris 10/x86: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-10/msg00180.html +FAIL: g

Re: define_memory_constraint and REG_OK_STRICT

2009-10-02 Thread Richard Henderson
On 10/02/2009 05:03 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote: That particular case works, and yes arm does it that way but there are other targets that uses (reload_completed || reload_in_progress) like s390. So thats why i had to ask if my definition of strict is proper or not. I am not sure which one to use

Re: Prague GCC folks meeting summary report

2009-10-02 Thread Andi Kleen
> To make the above work first the external tools have to add the > capabilities, just implementing it in GCC doesn't work for us. Ok, but there's more to building software, than just building rpms. For example I can definitely see a common use case where a program is built with line number and

Re: i370 port - constructing compile script

2009-10-02 Thread Paul Edwards
I tried again but I'm not making much progress. Maybe I need to go further than Canada, let's say Alaska. 1. First I need to use my current build machine, Linux, to first of all convert the i370.md into insn*.c files, then generate an xgcc. The xgcc would be capable of producing i370 code so lo

Re: Reload going wrong for addition.

2009-10-02 Thread Mohamed Shafi
2009/9/28 Richard Henderson : > On 09/28/2009 07:25 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote: >> >> Hope someone suggests me a solution. > > The solution is almost certainly something involving the > TARGET_SECONDARY_RELOAD hook.  You need to inform reload that it's going to > need some scratch registers in order t

Re: define_memory_constraint and REG_OK_STRICT

2009-10-02 Thread Mohamed Shafi
2009/9/30 Richard Henderson : > On 09/29/2009 09:46 PM, Mohamed Shafi wrote: >> >>  bool strict =  reload_completed ? true : false; > > What happens if you set "strict = false" here? > That's what ARM does. That particular case works, and yes arm does it that way but there are other targets that

Re: Prague GCC folks meeting summary report

2009-10-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Joe Buck wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 05:00:10PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Richard Guenther writes: > > > > > > The wish for more granular and thus smaller debug information (things like > > > -gfunction-arguments which would properly show parameter values > > > for bac