Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 17:48 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd say from the symptoms tasking doesn't work at all, could you try
>> with a simpler testcase:
>>
>> -- begin tt.adb
That works ok:
> $ ./tt.exe
> task
> main
>
> $
But there are clearly substanti
Quoting "Joseph S. Myers" :
Viewing deleted files and their history (and for SVN deleted branches are
just a special case of deleted files) is something SVN is bad at since you
do need to work out the last revision the file was present first. I hope
that any version control system we change to w
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>
> >>> other than having been merged into trunk (for example, it may have been
> >>> replaced by another branch without all change
Hi,
Anyone using/testing this configuration?
It dies for me in the build at libiberty and I
wondered if anyone was luckier. :)
Thanks.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a fre
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>>> other than having been merged into trunk (for example, it may have been
>>> replaced by another branch without all changes being merged into trunk).
>>
>> My inclination would b
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> other than having been merged into trunk (for example, it may have been
>> replaced by another branch without all changes being merged into trunk).
>
> My inclination would be to delete branches like that as well.
that sounds a sensible t
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Is -combine widely used? IIRC it has a lot of known issues and
> is basically unmaintained. Maybe if we deprecate -combine for 4.5
> we'll get feedback if it is used.
I have used it quite a bit, but now most often I just use a single
source file full of #include statem
On 09/25/2009 12:55 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do we believe any future conversion to another version control system
(that might have a more structured notion of what is a branch than it
simply being a directory used in a certain way) would continue to make the
history of such branches readily av
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Jason Merrill wrote:
> The SVN book
> (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html)
> suggests deleting feature branches that have been merged into the trunk; I
> think this would help to reduce the clutter in the branches directory and
> avoid con
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:53:04 -0400, Jason Merrill
wrote:
> On 09/24/2009 11:22 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> Can the lambda (containing X) be copied and put onto a queue? What is
>> its type?
>
> As you said, the lambda has a unique anonymous type. If you want to put
> multiple lambdas into a con
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 17:48 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd say from the symptoms tasking doesn't work at all, could you try
> with a simpler testcase:
>
> -- begin tt.adb
> with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
> procedure TT is
>task T;
>task body T is
>begin
> Put_Lin
Hi,
I'd say from the symptoms tasking doesn't work at all, could you try
with a simpler testcase:
-- begin tt.adb
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
procedure TT is
task T;
task body T is
begin
Put_Line ("task");
end;
begin
Put_Line ("main");
end;
-- end tt.adb
To my knowled
Jason Merrill writes:
> The SVN book
> (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html)
> suggests deleting feature branches that have been merged into the
> trunk; I think this would help to reduce the clutter in the branches
> directory and avoid confusion with people
The SVN book
(http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html)
suggests deleting feature branches that have been merged into the trunk;
I think this would help to reduce the clutter in the branches directory
and avoid confusion with people expecting to find ongoing deve
Paul Edwards wrote:
> As such, it's appropriate to simply comment it out (which was my
> "workaround"). However, before I do so, do you think this is close
> to being correct? I already made one correction, to put in that
> XL1 rather than doing a fullword (which was always zero obviously).
>
>
Mohamed Shafi writes:
> After analyzing the issue i find that this might be a bug. I just want
> to confirm if that is the case or not.
> In order to reproduce i think the target should have the following properties
> a. Only 2 32bit registers available as argument registers.
> b. Second 64bit va
I am doing a port for a 32bit target in GCC 4.4.0
I am getting segmentation fault in the function assign_temp in the
following line:
if (DECL_P (type_or_decl))
After analyzing the issue i find that this might be a bug. I just want
to confirm if that is the case or not.
In order to reproduce i thi
Am 25.09.2009 um 07:38 schrieb gerhard gangl:
hallo gcc_team suche gcc zum downloaden
wer kann mir helfen ?
liebe grüße u. danke im vorraus _gerhard_ gangl, reichsstr. 77, 8045
graz
Fast alle Linux Distributionen bringen gcc mit, man muss ihn nur mit
dem Paketmanager installieren. Ansonste
Ulrich, here's one of the workarounds I mentioned. The other one is
pretty similar to this one as well.
After my investigation, I've come to the conclusion that this never
worked, and was not noticed before, because the optimizer mustn't
have ever used it before.
As such, it's appropriate to si
19 matches
Mail list logo
