That depends a bit on the compiler version and optimization level,
but (in particular in the 3.x time frame) GCC may output assembler
code on a function-by-function basis, without necessarily reading
in the whole source file first.
Ok, actually it doesn't matter if it doesn't work all the time.
I've recently started my contributions to the gcc-in-cxx project, and
eventually decided on the qsort suggestion because it seems the
easiest one.
I've made the change in three places in cp/classes.c; the patch can be
found here:
http://code.google.com/p/ccppbrasil/wiki/GccInCxx
Is this the way
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20090811 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20090811/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 08/11/2009 11:20 AM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Ah okay. Would it be worth enhancing the tree-vec interface to include block
reallocation with size doubling and end
marking to allow for more efficient reallocation?
I don't think so; I expect that would end up being less space-efficient,
since in
Thanks for the feedback.
Jason Merrill wrote:
>Adam Butcher wrote:
>> The following examples produce
>> equivalent functions:
>>
>>1. [] (auto x, auto& y, auto const& z) { return x + y + z; }
>>2. [] (X x, Y& y, Z const& z) {
>> return x + y + z; }
>>3. [] (auto x, Y& y, auto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pop schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please test the attached version of CLooG-PPL?
This looks perfect now. Thanks a lot!
Only a minor flaw remains:
make clean gives:
rm /version.h
rm: cannot remove `/version.h': No such file or directory
Chee
A few comments:
/* XXX: Any way to get current location? */
input_location
The following examples produce
equivalent functions:
1. [] (auto x, auto& y, auto const& z) { return x + y + z; }
2. [] (X x, Y& y, Z const& z) {
return x + y + z; }
3. [] (auto x, Y& y, auto const&
Paul Edwards wrote:
> I expected that the assembler generation wouldn't happen until
> after the optimization was completed, and thus, by then, I
> would know whether this was a main.
That depends a bit on the compiler version and optimization level,
but (in particular in the 3.x time frame) GCC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pop schrieb:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:22, Rainer Emrich
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I build my gcc windows versions (*-pc-cygwin, *-pc-mingw32, *-w64-mingw32)
>> using
>> static build libraries gmp
Thank you.
> I am assuming you already have basic generation of auto-incs and you
> have your definitions for legitimate{legitimize}_address all set up
> correctly.
Well, I think they are. But the problem could be this. Here are cuts
from the machine description dealing with auto-inc-dec:
#defin
10 matches
Mail list logo
