Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> Nope, I just meant that you presumably had every right to do so and should
>> have felt free to exercise it because merging a branch justifies asking for a
>> freeze.
>
> Ok, I was not aware of that. My apologies. For some reason I thought
> only GWP folks (or thereabo
> And now you broke PowerPC and most other targets that call build_decl:
Most other targets? You mean *every* target that uses build_decl.
Oops, sorry about that.
The patch below fixes it. I can't do a bootstrap (I can't find the PPC
machine I have access to, and everyone seems to be in a hurry
> Nope, I just meant that you presumably had every right to do so and should
> have felt free to exercise it because merging a branch justifies asking for a
> freeze.
Ok, I was not aware of that. My apologies. For some reason I thought
only GWP folks (or thereabouts) could ask for a freeze. I
Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:51:42AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>> Hi folks.
>>>
>>> At the last minute Ian got a patch in that touched a bunch of places
>>> that I was also changing. I resolved the conflicts, and bootstrapped
>>> and tested for C and C
You do not have to make an announcement, but people generally have
asked for a freeze around a major merge so that problems from the new
functionality can be pinpointed and merge conflicts can be avoided.
David
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:51
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:51:42AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > At the last minute Ian got a patch in that touched a bunch of places
> > that I was also changing. I resolved the conflicts, and bootstrapped
> > and tested for C and C++. Unfortunately, peop
Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> At the last minute Ian got a patch in that touched a bunch of places
> that I was also changing. I resolved the conflicts, and bootstrapped
> and tested for C and C++. Unfortunately, people kept committing stuff
> that caused conflicts, so I broke down and c
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> At the last minute Ian got a patch in that touched a bunch of places
> that I was also changing. I resolved the conflicts, and bootstrapped
> and tested for C and C++. Unfortunately, people kept committing stuff
> that caused
Hi folks.
At the last minute Ian got a patch in that touched a bunch of places
that I was also changing. I resolved the conflicts, and bootstrapped
and tested for C and C++. Unfortunately, people kept committing stuff
that caused conflicts, so I broke down and committed after a minor C/C++
boots
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:11:06PM -0500, Graham Reitz wrote:
>
> Is there a machine description template in the gcc file source tree?
>
> If there is also template for the 'C header file of macro definitions'
> that would be good to know too.
>
> I did a file search for '.md' and there are to
Zachary Turner wrote:
> I guess the same reason people would want any asm functions in C
> source code. Sometimes it's just the best way to express something.
> Like in the example I mentioned, I could write 4 different functions
> in assembly, one for each size suffix, wrap them all up in a sepa
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Zachary Turner wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Paolo Bonzini
>> wrote:
This is one example, but it illustrates a general concept that I think
is really useful and I personally have used numerous times for lots of
ot
Zachary Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Paolo Bonzini
> wrote:
>>> This is one example, but it illustrates a general concept that I think
>>> is really useful and I personally have used numerous times for lots of
>>> other instructions than SCAS. If there is a way to achieve thi
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> This is one example, but it illustrates a general concept that I think
>> is really useful and I personally have used numerous times for lots of
>> other instructions than SCAS. If there is a way to achieve this
>> without using a naked fun
This is one example, but it illustrates a general concept that I think
is really useful and I personally have used numerous times for lots of
other instructions than SCAS. If there is a way to achieve this
without using a naked function then please advise.
Keeping the __asm syntax, I'd be surpr
Hi,
I know this has been discussed before, I have read through some of the
archives and read about some of the rationale. I want to raise it
again however, because I don't think anyone has ever presented a good
example of where it is really really useful on x86 architectures.
In general, it is v
Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
I've gone back to this problem (since I've solved another one ;-)).
And I've moved forward a bit:
It seems that if I consider an array of characters, there are no
longer any shifts and therefore I do get my two loads with the use of
an offset:
The reason there are
17 matches
Mail list logo
