Hello,
I want to go through the entire internal tree in GCC but I have a
problem with functions.
Indeed I would like to know the declarations and functions called by a
function.
I assume I have to go into the function's scope but I don't know how.
I read the source code but I didn't find anythi
From: "Allan McRae"
I have noticed that mpc is not automatically detected even when
installed in the standard library path (with gcc-4.5-20090604). This
means that building with mpc always requires using the
--with-mpc-lib=/usr/lib flag.
This is fixed by adjusting configure{.ac} to have:
m
I am using gcc 4.1.1 to do research involving gimple. For this work I need to
know the sizes of all of my variables, without running the program and calling
"sizeof".
To accomplish this, I inserted a call to:
dump_referenced_vars(dump_file_ptr);
At first, everything looked fine. The output lo
> It would be nice if it worked this way, but the dozens of patches to fix
> -g/-g0 compile differences I posted over the last several months show
> it's really not that simple, because the codegen IR does not tell the
> whole story. We have kind of IR extensions for debug info, for types
> and te
> GMP and MPFR are required components of GCC, and every developer has to
> deal with them. For interfacing between GCC and LLVM, the experts who'll
> be able to answer the questions are generally going to be found on the
> LLVM lists, not the gcc list, and those (like you) who participate on
> bo
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20090607 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20090607/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 06/07/09 13:38, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> On 06/07/09 12:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> Is this mirror an independent conversion from the infradead one (i.e., I
>>> have to throw away the repo and re-download a full repo? Or can I reuse
On Jun 6, 2009, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> So if I understand the above right then VTA is a new source of
>> code-generation differences with -g vs. -g0. A possibly quite
>> bad one (compared to what we have now).
> IIUC it's a paradigm shift: currently the absence of differences in the
> genera
On Jun 5, 2009, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>>
>> We can measure some of these things now. Some can even be measured
>> objectively ;-)
> Do you have any of them handy (memory use, compile time with release
> checking only, etc) so that we can start the public
> argument^H^H^H^H^H^discussion?
> ;)
Hi Everyone
I will be participating at PLDI 2009 SRC (ACM Programming Language
Design and Implementation) with my poster "Mathematical Apparatus for
Aggressive Optimization of Register Allocation in a Library for
Just-In-Time Compilation in Microsoft Common Intermediate Language
Runtimes on Embed
Hi,
I search gcc ML and find this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-05/msg00413.html
but here i have source with no 64 bit CPU.
is the fix now in and should i test current gcc4.4 ?
I also like to know if there is possible to build a gcc with better error
messages ?
It show as error place last bra
On 06/07/09 13:38, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 06/07/09 12:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Is this mirror an independent conversion from the infradead one (i.e., I
>> have to throw away the repo and re-download a full repo? Or can I reuse
>> objects)?
>
> It's an independent mirror, and I wouldn
On 06/07/09 12:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Is this mirror an independent conversion from the infradead one (i.e., I
> have to throw away the repo and re-download a full repo? Or can I reuse
> objects)?
It's an independent mirror, and I wouldn't recommend switching to it yet.
There are permiss
Hello Bernie,
* Bernie Innocenti wrote on Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:17:44PM CEST:
> On 06/07/09 07:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > sorry if this is not an official mirror of the GCC tree, but
> > has not been updated since
> > June 1. Any chance you (or whoever is responsible) could look into it?
>
On 06/07/09 07:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Bernardo,
>
> sorry if this is not an official mirror of the GCC tree, but
> has not been updated since
> June 1. Any chance you (or whoever is responsible) could look into it?
The git-svn process was stuck on a read(), with the socket to
gcc.gn
15 matches
Mail list logo
