On Thursday 2009-01-01 03:05, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I have here an (attached) testcase which unexpectedly turns off
>> warnings. Compiling it using `gcc test.c -c -Wall` (or test.i) gives:
>>
>> test.c: In function 'pam_sm_aut
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have here an (attached) testcase which unexpectedly turns off
> warnings. Compiling it using `gcc test.c -c -Wall` (or test.i) gives:
>
> test.c: In function 'pam_sm_authenticate':
> test.c:6: warning: implicit declaration of fun
Hi,
I have here an (attached) testcase which unexpectedly turns off
warnings. Compiling it using `gcc test.c -c -Wall` (or test.i) gives:
test.c: In function ‘pam_sm_authenticate’:
test.c:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘undef’
What I would have expected:
test.c: In function ‘pam
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20081231 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20081231/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hi Joost,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
>>> Would be great if such a thing could be detected at configure time
>>> (i.e. like missing mpfr.h headers are already detected), with some
>>> kind of a gentle error message.
>> It wouldn't be detected until the target libs are built, s
