Re: Tru64 non-virtual thunks multiply defined

2008-12-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:32:22AM -0600, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Hi, > > When building qt-3.3.8 and wxGTk on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 > (alphaev67-dec-osf5.1) with gcc-4.2.4, we got linker failures about > duplicate non-virtual thunks, e.g. from qt: > /usr/ccs/bin/ld: > .obj/release-shared-mt/qmotifdnd_x11

Re: gcc and the kernel

2008-12-29 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Brian O'Mahoney wrote: > OK, there are a few more things to say about gcc, and the kernel, and > distributions (also the way patches to both work, to both). > > Stipulations: (a) I always try to run the current stable kernel, released by > the 'stable-team' led by

gcc and the kernel

2008-12-29 Thread Brian O'Mahoney
OK, there are a few more things to say about gcc, and the kernel, and distributions (also the way patches to both work, to both). Stipulations: (a) I always try to run the current stable kernel, released by the 'stable-team' led by GKH. But he is getting too good, stable is 2.6.27.10 but I am run

Re: [lto] [RFC] Design proposal for debug support in LTO

2008-12-29 Thread Mark Mitchell
Richard Guenther wrote: >> Hve you considered to just use DWARF and translate the DWARF debug >> info to a different format in LTRANS? For example, user wants stabs, >> LGEN generates DWARF, LTRANS reads in the DWARF, and dbxout is >> modified to translate the DWARF to stabs. > > +1 +2 This wa

Re: Odd performance regression with -Os

2008-12-29 Thread Mark Mitchell
Andrew Haley wrote: > Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> Thanks. Are you holding this because we're in Stage 3? >> The patch was written very recently so I wanted to let it go through a good >> deal of internal testing. Moveover I haven't measured its impact on >> anything >> else than Ada benchmarks (a

Re: [lto] [RFC] Design proposal for debug support in LTO

2008-12-29 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Cary Coutant wrote: >> Another approach is to generate the debug information earlier -- in >> the front-end. This approach would significantly alter the structure >> of the compiler and would be a major un

Re: Odd performance regression with -Os

2008-12-29 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> Thanks. Are you holding this because we're in Stage 3? >> >> The patch was written very recently so I wanted to let it go through a good >> deal of internal testing. Moveover I haven't measured its impact on anythin

Re: get_ref_base_and_extent() semantics

2008-12-29 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:26:38PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > today I have encoun