Hi Angela
> I would like to install a g77 on my version of Linux that is Scientific
> Linux SL-52-062608-i386.
> I tried to install 3 packages of g77 but I don't know what is the package
> suitable for me and my Linux version.
This mailing list is for discussing the development of gcc and g77,
ra
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hello Steering Committee,
>> I raised this on the steering committee...
>
> You've got the hat, Kai, congratulations! Please update the
Hi all.
I'm a Gentoo user with an Athlon XP:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+
stepping: 0
cpu MHz : 2157.092
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hello Steering Committee,
> I raised this on the steering committee...
You've got the hat, Kai, congratulations! Please update the MAINTAINERS
file accordingly.
Happy hacking,
Gerald
On 11:02 Mon 01 Dec , David Daney wrote:
> Zhang Le wrote:
>> On 10:33 Mon 01 Dec , David Daney wrote:
>>> Zhang Le wrote:
BASE_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
+LINUX_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
" %{!EB:%{!EL:%(endian_spec)}}" \
" %{!mabi=*: -mabi=n32}"
>>> You are missing a comma there bet
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 08:59 -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Doug,
>Is there a reason why prune.exp is loaded in lib/gcc.exp and lib/g++.exp
> but never actually used? I need to prune a linker warning with..
>
> regsub -all "(^|\n)ld: warning: can't make compact unwind encoding from dwarf
> for \
Zhang Le wrote:
On 10:33 Mon 01 Dec , David Daney wrote:
Zhang Le wrote:
BASE_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
+LINUX_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
" %{!EB:%{!EL:%(endian_spec)}}" \
" %{!mabi=*: -mabi=n32}"
You are missing a comma there between BASE_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS and
LINUX_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS. Without the comm
On 10:33 Mon 01 Dec , David Daney wrote:
> Zhang Le wrote:
>> BASE_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
>> +LINUX_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
>> " %{!EB:%{!EL:%(endian_spec)}}" \
>> " %{!mabi=*: -mabi=n32}"
>
> You are missing a comma there between BASE_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS and
> LINUX_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS. Without the comma
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Thomas Schwinge as GCC maintainer for GNU Hurd.
Please join me in congratulating Thomas on his new role.
Thomas, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
Zhang Le wrote:
Hi there,
I have just tried gcc 4.4 svn trunk on a MIPS N32 system.
But I found -mplt is practically not usable, because -mno-shared is not used
when generating non-PIC code.
I dug into the code and found the cause is in gcc/config/mips/linux64.h.
Unlike linux.h under the same d
Hi there,
I have just tried gcc 4.4 svn trunk on a MIPS N32 system.
But I found -mplt is practically not usable, because -mno-shared is not used
when generating non-PIC code.
I dug into the code and found the cause is in gcc/config/mips/linux64.h.
Unlike linux.h under the same directory, DRIVER_S
2008/12/1 K.J. Kuan-Jau Lin(林寬釗) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Shaun,
>
> I have trouble in uClinux world.
> After long and painful debugging, i found it is due to the "R_ARM_GOTOFF32"
> relocation type.
> By google, i found you got the same problem before.
> (http://mailman.uclinux.org/pipermail/uclin
On 12/01/08 11:50:48, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > cse_insn() calls lookup_as_function() ultimately through fold_rtx(), IIRC,
> > and is the routine that writes the REG_EQUAL note.
>
> OK, thanks. But I'm a little at a loss as to why this problem arises only
> now: the problematic code in lookup_as_f
Alan Lehotsky wrote:
Look at the implementation of the IP2K compiler and linker.
It uses a segmented paged architecture just like the machine you are
describing.
In essence what we did was implement linker relaxation to deal with this.
When we called any function, we emitted the appropriate lo
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:18:22PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Steve Kargl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ERRMSG.12 = &"Attempt to deallocate an unallocated object"[1]{lb: 1 sz:
> > 1};
> > -ERRMSG.12 = stat.11 != 0 ? (void) __builtin_memcpy ((vo
Doug,
Is there a reason why prune.exp is loaded in lib/gcc.exp and lib/g++.exp
but never actually used? I need to prune a linker warning with..
regsub -all "(^|\n)ld: warning: can't make compact unwind encoding from dwarf
for \[^\n\]* in \[^\n\]*" $text "" text
on x86_64-apple-darwin10 to sup
Hi All:
Now I am working on the procedure of fixinclude in building gcc
and got following concepts.
Take three PATH as example to illustrate,
ginclude: which provided by gcc source includes system
headers wanted by gcc;
sys_inc : the location of system header files;
loca
Dear all,
I would like to install a g77 on my version of Linux that is Scientific
Linux SL-52-062608-i386.
I tried to install 3 packages of g77 but I don't know what is the package
suitable for me and my Linux version.
Could you be so kind to indicate me the correct link for downloading g77
packa
All,
One thing that may or may not be related is that the current main
fails to bootstrap on x86_64 with fold checking enabled.
It aborts due to a fold-checking failure (i.e fold has modified
it's inputs) using the stage1 compiler. I don't recall exactly which
file it triggers on (I think it w
> cse_insn() calls lookup_as_function() ultimately through fold_rtx(), IIRC,
> and is the routine that writes the REG_EQUAL note.
OK, thanks. But I'm a little at a loss as to why this problem arises only
now: the problematic code in lookup_as_function is one decade old. Do you
happen to have ol
20 matches
Mail list logo
