Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

2008-11-27 Thread liqin
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Unconverted targets will be added to the deprecation list when the old > allocator is removed, and removed from trunk along with the other > deprecated targets shortly after 4.4 branches; until then, target > maintainers may remove them from the deprecation list as part of

Several puzzles about gcc top level makefile

2008-11-27 Thread Cheng bin
Hi Groups: Right now I am studying the procedure of building gcc(mipsel cross compiler), so I look into the makefiles generated by configure procedure. This message is about the top level makefile, I got most of it (It's some kind of well structured) except several puzzles as following 1 : At

gcc-4.3-20081127 is now available

2008-11-27 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20081127 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20081127/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Problem with x64 SEH macro implementation for ReactOS

2008-11-27 Thread Ross Ridge
Kai Tietz writes: >Well, you mean the SEH tables on stack. No, I mean the ABI required unwind information. > Well, those aren't implemented (as they aren't for 32-bit). 64-bit SEH handling is completely different from 32-bit SEH handling. In the 64-bit Windows ABI exceptions are handled using u

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

2008-11-27 Thread Vladimir Makarov
Jeff Law wrote: Joseph S. Myers wrote: Vladimir, is there any news on the patch to remove the old allocator since , or on getting m32c and IRA working together? Vlad is relatively busy dealing with PRs as they're reported, the optimization reg

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

2008-11-27 Thread Jeff Law
Joseph S. Myers wrote: Vladimir, is there any news on the patch to remove the old allocator since , or on getting m32c and IRA working together? Vlad is relatively busy dealing with PRs as they're reported, the optimization regressions in parti

Re: Problem with x64 SEH macro implementation for ReactOS

2008-11-27 Thread Kai Tietz
2008/11/27 Ross Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Kai Tietz writes: >>I am very interested to learn, which parts in calling convention aren't >>implemented for w64? > > Well, maybe I'm missing something but I can't any see code in GCC for > generating prologues, epilogues and unwind tables in the format

GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

2008-11-27 Thread Joseph S. Myers
Status == Trunk is in Stage 4 (regression and documentation fixes mode). GCC 4.4 will be branched when there are no open P1 regressions for 4.4 and the total number of P1, P2 and P3 regressions for 4.4 is 100 or below. Trunk will open for Stage 1 for GCC 4.5 immediately after 4.4 branches, a

Re: Problem with x64 SEH macro implementation for ReactOS

2008-11-27 Thread Ross Ridge
Kai Tietz writes: >I am very interested to learn, which parts in calling convention aren't >implemented for w64? Well, maybe I'm missing something but I can't any see code in GCC for generating prologues, epilogues and unwind tables in the format required by the Windows x64 ABI. http://

Re: __Unwind_GetIPInfo on Darwin 8.11

2008-11-27 Thread IainS
On 27 Nov 2008, at 01:13, Geoff Keating wrote: On 26/11/2008, at 4:16 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:22:35PM -0800, Geoffrey Keating wrote: Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Iain, The use of the system libgcc simply won't work on Mac OS X 10.4. The mis

Re: Problem with x64 SEH macro implementation for ReactOS

2008-11-27 Thread Kai Tietz
Hi Ross, I am very interested to learn, which parts in calling convention aren't implemented for w64? Do you mean the SEH stack reservation? If you could specify it more detailed, I could correct it for 4.5. I am a bit curious, as I found that the unwind mechanism of Windows itself working quit