ok,
wrt the below, I was giving it some thought, and was wondering how
usable the gcc lexer/parser combo was by itself, how 'pluggable' it
was - my hope was that I could take the lexer/parser and instead of
making an executable out of the incoming code, I could transform the
code in place, ie: add
> though that is probably inadequate.
Especially because Makefile.in is automatically generated. :-)
> It's not the default goal that matters, but if bootstrap4 is a goal at all.
> Or if compare3 is a goal.
I have a (correct) patch which I'll apply in a day or two.
Thanks,
Paolo
>> I noticed that in the default Firefox3 configuration on my 1280x1024
display
>> your code samples on this page are tiny, and v.hard to read:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html
I'd like to hear from other people about whether the examples are too
small in their
Hi Adriaticus,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Adriaticus wrote:
> welcome
> I would like to create mirror gcc
> http://mirror.adriaticus.org/pub/gcc/
> ftp://mirror.adriaticus.org/pub/gcc/
just go ahead! Once the mirror is up and running a patch against
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html to add an new entry
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jonathan Grant wrote:
>> I noticed that in the default Firefox3 configuration on my 1280x1024 display
>> your code samples on this page are tiny, and v.hard to read:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.or
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#alpha-dec-osf
>>
>> "Note that since the Alpha is a 64-bit architecture, cross-compilers from
>> 32-bit machines will not generate code as efficient as that generated when
>> the compiler is running on a 64-b
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jonathan Grant wrote:
> I noticed that in the default Firefox3 configuration on my 1280x1024 display
> your code samples on this page are tiny, and v.hard to read:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html
>
> I see in the HTML this is the code causing the small font:
Hi Dennis,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> I noticed that the "Build status for GCC" page has no link
> at all for 4.3.x and it would be nice to add that there please.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html
thanks for catching this; I just committed the patch included at the
end of
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are the rules for porting patches back from the graphite
> branch that fix ICEs when -fgraphite is used to compile code?
> There doesn't seem to have been much movement of patches out of
> the graphite branch lately.
