Hi I was wondering if there was a version of gcc that would produce output to
be ran on an LC3 simulator. Much help would be appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/version-of-gcc-with-LC3-support--tp19830505p19830505.html
Sent from the gcc - Dev mailing list archive
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess I should really be asking:
> How did most people here learn devving for GCC?
Read the source Luke!
There is no comprehensive out-of-source documentation of the C++ forntend.
Separate documentation is an exception, s
I've been planning to add a warning to GCC for a while.
I've recently begun learning the GCC internals and trying to add some code.
So far I have made very little progress.
All I have working is a warning parameter that, when enabled, emits a
warning whenever a function is declared. It's not look
2008/10/5 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ah, right. Don't we want this page to be version-specific beyond
> gcc.gnu.org/gcc-X.Y/?
> (like all of the installation instructions, liked from onlinedocs/
> there is only instructions
> for trunk).
This is bug 32927.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> This is reasonable. Note that
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html already lists
>> mpfr 2.3.0 as prerequesite (that page still might need an update for
>> clarifi
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
> This is reasonable. Note that
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html already lists
> mpfr 2.3.0 as prerequesite (that page still might need an update for
> clarification).
That page is generated from gcc/doc/install.texi, so once Kaveh has
co
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since we're in stage3, I'm raising the issue of the MPFR version we
> require for GCC, just as in last year's stage3 for gcc-4.3:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-12/msg00298.html
>
> I'd like to increase the "minimum" MPFR
