Re: Problems building Windows hosted mips-elf toolchain using Linux as build machine

2008-09-13 Thread Aaron W. LaFramboise
Hi Øyvind, Øyvind Harboe wrote: I'm trying to build a mips-elf toolchain hosted on Windows using Linux as the build machine but I'm running into the following error: mips-elf-gcc -nostdinc -isystem /tmp/gccbuild/build/gcc/./gcc/include -B/tmp/gccbuild/build/gcc/mips-elf/newlib/ -isystem /tmp/

Re: old but current libiberty/strsignal vs. cygwin

2008-09-13 Thread Aaron W. LaFramboise
Hi Jay, Thanks for bringing this up. I mainly work on the native-ish Windows targets (MinGW), so I'm not really a Cygwin guy, but see below. Jay wrote: I'm still testing this but it does seem to be two smoking guns. The first one shot a blank but I doubt I'll find a third. :) ... > Can s

GRAPHITE Prerequisites Documentation, System Issues

2008-09-13 Thread Aaron W. LaFramboise
I'm happy to see that GRAPHITE it is in trunk now! I don't see any documentation of prerequisites in install.texi yet; perhaps we should add this so users can figure out what they need to do to get this framework to work. In fact, 'grep -i graphite gcc/doc/*' doesn't match anything, so I gues

Re: [Tuples] gimple_build_call_from_tree vs NeXT runtime Objective-C

2008-09-13 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > When looking into stret-1.m failure, I noticed that > gimple_build_call_from_tree calls get_callee_fndecl to get the "real" > function decl. Well for OBJ_TYPE_REF in Objective-C, it will return > objc_msgSendSuper_s

hercules sang melvin

2008-09-13 Thread anu cindy
mani ivor bevis rollin remy ho thorsten jnye anu cindy janna

Re: gdb test suite failure on i386 and x86_64 in gdb.base/break.exp

2008-09-13 Thread Cary Coutant
> This is PR 36690 which has various bits of analysis. Thanks! I did search for this problem, but I guess I didn't use the right terms, and it didn't turn up this bug report. Looks like if I had done another search after analyzing the problem, it probably would have turned up. -cary

Re: Status of GCC 4.4 (Debian)

2008-09-13 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given that GCC moved to stage 3 recently, I decided to build the Debian > archive to identify new issues before GCC 4.4 is released. I compiled > the entire Debian archive (just under 8000 packages that need to be > com

Status of GCC 4.4 (Debian)

2008-09-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Given that GCC moved to stage 3 recently, I decided to build the Debian archive to identify new issues before GCC 4.4 is released. I compiled the entire Debian archive (just under 8000 packages that need to be compiled) on x86_64, ia64 and powerpc, and about 1800 packages on arm (EABI). I also wa