On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Kaveh Ghazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Right, here's the original link where I mention it:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01658.html
> >
> > This involves a cast from one type to another through a void*. I haven't
> > been abl
On 7/10/08, Kaveh R. GHAZI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, it's on my list.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00772.html
Thanks!
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> From: "NightStrike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On 7/8/08, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > I was under the impression that these would be cleaned up before the
> >> > -W options were appl
Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:48 PM, H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In that chmod() is not defined by the Fortran Standard,
how can you infer that libgfortran's implementation is
incorrect?
Please read a decent UNIX system book or look how
system () is implemen
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In this case, I argue that this code is always compiled with a C
>> compiler, and should never be compiled by a C++ compiler. Therefore,
>> I believe it is wrong for this code to be compiled with the
>> -Wc++-compat warning
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 07:17:58PM -0400, Mark Mielke wrote:
> Joe Buck wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:26:43PM -0400, Jack Lloyd wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:17:43PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> >>
> >>Presumably one could just take the code from the last GPLv2 version of
> >>c
> In this case, I argue that this code is always compiled with a C
> compiler, and should never be compiled by a C++ compiler. Therefore,
> I believe it is wrong for this code to be compiled with the
> -Wc++-compat warning enabled. This should be fixed somewhere in the
> configure script and/or M
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:48 PM, H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In that chmod() is not defined by the Fortran Standard,
>> how can you infer that libgfortran's implementation is
>> incorrect?
>>
>
> Please read a decent UNIX system book or look how
> system () is implemented in glibc.
Well,
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20080709 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20080709/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Steve Kargl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 02:20:55PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Do you have an appli
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 02:38:51PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:16:33PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Note that this isn't just GPLv2 vs 3 or anything like that, I think we
> > > generally need permission when moving code
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:16:33PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Note that this isn't just GPLv2 vs 3 or anything like that, I think we
> > generally need permission when moving code from one project to
> > another.
>
> The chmod parser is actually comi
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 02:20:55PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you have an application that shows that the current
> >> implementation of chmod() is a bottle
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:24:44PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:0
Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Note that this isn't just GPLv2 vs 3 or anything like that, I think we
> generally need permission when moving code from one project to
> another.
The chmod parser is actually coming from gnulib, whose sole purpose is
to be shared among GNU projects.
Andrea
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:24:44PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:07:10PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >> libgfortran calls fork/exec /bin/chmo
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:24:44PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:07:10PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> libgfortran calls fork/exec /bin/chmod to parse argument to chmod.
> >> Is that OK to borrow code from cor
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:24:44PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:07:10PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> libgfortran calls fork/exec /bin/chmod to parse argument to chmod.
> >> Is that OK to borrow code from cor
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:26:43PM -0400, Jack Lloyd wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:17:43PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:07:10PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > libgfortran calls fork/exec /bin/chmod to parse argument to chmod.
> > > Is that OK to borrow code from coreutil
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:17:43PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:07:10PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > libgfortran calls fork/exec /bin/chmod to parse argument to chmod.
> > Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils which implements /bin/chmod
> > to properly implement chmod? coreu
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:07:10PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> libgfortran calls fork/exec /bin/chmod to parse argument to chmod.
>> Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils which implements /bin/chmod
>> to properly implement chmod
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:07:10PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> libgfortran calls fork/exec /bin/chmod to parse argument to chmod.
> Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils which implements /bin/chmod
> to properly implement chmod? coreutils is under GPLv3 while libgfortran
> is under GPLv2 + exception
Hi,
libgfortran calls fork/exec /bin/chmod to parse argument to chmod.
Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils which implements /bin/chmod
to properly implement chmod? coreutils is under GPLv3 while libgfortran
is under GPLv2 + exception. Is that possible to get permission from
the FSF to borrow
This is likely to have been my patch.
I'm minimizing the check_construct_destroy failure right now.
If someone could give me some idea of what is causing the execution
failures while i do that, i may be able to fix them faster :)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Hi,
just to be sure people notice: there are new (1-2 days max) regressions in
libstdc++, caused by compiler changes. See, for example:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-07/msg00824.html
I can look a bit more into this in the next days, but again I pretty much
exclude this has been
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > to its language tree.def and gimplify this. Before I embark on this
> > I'd like to ask whether using __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp is
> > definitely the wrong way to go?
>
> Definitely. You will be not able to handle/throw exceptions from
Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > If you care about GDB on mips-irix, I strongly advise caring about GCC as
> > well, or finding someone to care about it. Right now, it is on the list
> > of targets to be deprecated in GCC 4.4 because we wish to remove fixproto
> > and it is one of the few targets stil
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Gaius Mulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to implement the exception handling in GNU
> Modula-2 and was wondering which of the following two routes to use.
> I was initially enthusiastic about using __builtin_setjmp/
> __builtin_longjmp
Hi,
I'm currently trying to implement the exception handling in GNU
Modula-2 and was wondering which of the following two routes to use.
I was initially enthusiastic about using __builtin_setjmp/
__builtin_longjmp as Modula-2 exceptions can be implemented with these
mechanisms - and it would also
Hello,
We have following original Cisco,Card,GBIC/SFP,WIC,cables items for sale
If you are interested, pls feel free to contact me.
example of the products:
CWDM-SFP-1G 38dB (Ultra long-haul)--1510nm,1530nm,1550nm,1570nm,1590nm,1610nm
WS-G5483,
GLC-SX-MM
SFP-GE-L
WS-G5487,
WS-G5484,
WS-G5486
30 matches
Mail list logo
