Hello all,
For the 16-bit target that i porting now to gcc 4.1.2 doesn't have any
branch instructions. It only has jump instructions. For comparison
operation it has this instruction:
if cond Rx Ry
execute this insn
So compare and branch is implemented as
if cond Rx Ry
jmp Label
This instru
sorry that I couldn't re-produce the warning as you said.
micro# /import/dr3/s10/gcc-4.2/bin/gcc val-prof-1.c -fprofile-arcs -g
-o val-prof-1.x1
micro# /import/dr3/s10/gcc-4.2/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.10
Configured with: /import/dr2/starlex/1/gcc-4.2-20070228/con
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20080507 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20080507/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 11:03 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > Can you please also add the replacement hunk from:
> >
> > o;?http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg00693.html
> >
> > If the first part gets backported, I'd like the second hunk to
> > go along with it if possible. Thanks.
> >
> Can you please also add the replacement hunk from:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg00693.html
>
> If the first part gets backported, I'd like the second hunk to
> go along with it if possible. Thanks.
>
> Peter
I was wondering about that patch since it seems to be relat
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:10 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Yes, it looks like it is. I added -fno-strict-aliasing and the perl
> benchmarks passed when compiled with ToT GCC. That makes me feel better
> about the idea of putting Peter's patch (with the revert) on the 4.3
> branch as a way to fix th
> Hi Steve,
>
> Is your perl test problem the same as
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33383
>
>
> H.J.
Yes, it looks like it is. I added -fno-strict-aliasing and the perl
benchmarks passed when compiled with ToT GCC. That makes me feel better
about the idea of putting Peter's
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Peter Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:45 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > > I have found that this problem does not occur on the ToT sources and
> > > that the problem went away with
> From: Peter Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:45 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > I have found that this problem does not occur on the ToT sources and
> > that the problem went away with this patch:
> >
> > 2008-04-07 Peter Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >PR
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:45 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I have found that this problem does not occur on the ToT sources and
> that the problem went away with this patch:
>
> 2008-04-07 Peter Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>PR middle-end/PR28690
>* rtlanal.c: Update copyright
I said if you compile val-prof-1.c the same way bprob-1.c is compiled
you get an warning.
gcc -g -fprofile-arcs val-prof-1.c -o val-prof-1.x1
Lijuan Hai wrote:
seen in gcc-4.2, gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c is compiled with
-fprofile-arcs and -fbranch-probabilities.
gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-1.c
> Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > I am investigating a bad code generation bug on the 64 bit HPPA platform
> > with GCC 4.3.0 and would like some help and/or ideas on how to analyze
> > and fix it. The failing test is the SPEC 2000 GCC benchmark (version
> > 2.7.2.2) and I have been unable to create a sma
Similarly on i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 which had the same build failure
mode and also seems fine again.
Thanks,
Gerald
Thank you for your answer.
But I want to know if it is possible to start the program, to break it
and set a flag (or something like that) to start coverage counter.
Then resume the execution to have a coverage count.
The aim of that is to count the number of line executed when one
special action
14 matches
Mail list logo
