Re: GCC mirror changing IPs

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Joe Laffey wrote: If you could enable the mirror access for the new IP I would appreciate it. Note that the old IP may be active for a little while as well. I am using it to get the latest release right now. I've forwarded this t

Re: GCC mirror changing IPs

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Joe Laffey wrote: > If you could enable the mirror access for the new IP I would appreciate > it. Note that the old IP may be active for a little while as well. I am > using it to get the latest release right now. I've forwarded this to the group of admins for the gcc.gnu.or

possible bug with libstdc++ in gcc4.3 20080215 linked to old user /usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib

I installed gcc4.3 20080215 on os x10.5.2 using macports The configure arguments (with prefix = /opt/local) are: 47 configure.args --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++ \ 48 --libdir=${prefix}/lib/${name} \ 49 --includedir=${prefix}/include/${name} \

Re: [Ada] 4.3.0-rc1 available

Laurent GUERBY wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone working on those FAIL? Uros looked at this for me and thinks it might be due to

GCC mirror changing IPs

Hi, We operate a GCC release mirror in St. Louis, MO (mirrors.laffeycomputer.com). This server has changed IP addresses, which is normally no worry on your end. But the old IP had special access to the master server to be able to download the releases right when they came out, and thus take s

Re: [Ada] 4.3.0-rc1 available

On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 09:23 -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > > > Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html > > > > I see lots

PureMessage has detected a content threat

PureMessage has detected a content threat in a mail sent by you. Event: Threat Action: Message quarantined Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message subject:Re: Message Error Recipient: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [Ada] 4.3.0-rc1 available

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html > > I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone > working on those

Re: [Ada] 4.3.0-rc1 available

Laurent GUERBY writes: > Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html > > I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone > working on those FAIL? > > I collec

Re: Fix C++0x regressions for gcc-4.3

Joe Buck escreveu: > There is no such thing as a "C++0x regression", since (very limited and > experimental) C++0x support is brand new in 4.3, and 4.3.0 hasn't been > released yet. A regression is something that worked correctly in a > previously released version of GCC, but that doesn't work now

Re: [Ada] 4.3.0-rc1 available

Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone working on those FAIL? I collected on gcc-testresults quite good Ada res