Hi,
I wanted to post the Ada ACATS results for
4.2.3 and the SVN trunk for powerpc-rtems.
4.2.3: PASSED: 2309 FAILED3
Trunk: PASSED: 1623 FAILED 689
4.2.3 only failed c380004, c761007, and c953002.
Obviously things are MUCH worse on the trunk.
The last time I ran it on sparc-rtems, the re
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20080208 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20080208/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
I can confirm that I had no troubles building i686-linux with latest
sources.
I suspect a miscompilation of the previous stage compiler, possibly caused
by a bad initial compiler used to start the bootstrap, or the use of
"dangerous" compiler option during bootstrap.
I'd suggest trying again with
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 11:02 AM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please try native compiler first.
Finished with no errors on "make". Any other step?
Which trunk revision are you using?
xgcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080208 (experimental) [trunk revisi
On Feb 8, 2008 11:02 AM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Please try native compiler first.
> >
> Finished with no errors on "make". Any other step?
Which trunk revision are you using? Can you configure gcc with
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=assert
--
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:41:07AM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 9:37 AM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strange. I update this morning and built a new native Fedora 8 ia32
compiler followed by a cross to powerpc-rtems. The
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:41:07AM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2008 9:37 AM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Strange. I update this morning and built a new native Fedora 8 ia32
>>> compiler followed by a cross to powerpc-rtems. The native was
>>> c
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 9:37 AM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strange. I update this morning and built a new native Fedora 8 ia32
compiler followed by a cross to powerpc-rtems. The native was
configured as:
../gcc/configure \
--with-gnu-as --disable-multilib \
--with-gn
On Feb 8, 2008 9:37 AM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Strange. I update this morning and built a new native Fedora 8 ia32
> compiler followed by a cross to powerpc-rtems. The native was
> configured as:
>
> ../gcc/configure \
> --with-gnu-as --disable-multilib \
> --with-gnu-ld -
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:54:47PM +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
I tried to build Ada at trunk revision 131899 on Linux/ia32. It failed
on RHEL4/ia32 and Fedora 8/ia32. But I can build Ada on Linux/Intel64.
Is there a known problem?
It should work AFAIK. What kind of err
This is the beta release of binutils 2.18.50.0.4 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2008 0208 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree.
You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been
> /export/build/gnu/gcc-ada/build-i686-linux/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/export/build/gnu/gcc-ada/build-i686-linux/./gcc/
> -B/usr/gcc-4.3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/gcc-4.3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/
> -isystem /usr/gcc-4.3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
> /usr/gcc-4.3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -c
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:11 -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> 2008/2/7 Tobias Grosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2. Which loops are part of a SCoP:
> >
> > At the moment we detect the loops, which are part of a SCoP like this:
> >
> > FORALL_BB_IN_SCOP(bb)
> > {
> > VEC_loops_add(bb->loop_father);
> >
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:54:47PM +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > I tried to build Ada at trunk revision 131899 on Linux/ia32. It failed
> > on RHEL4/ia32 and Fedora 8/ia32. But I can build Ada on Linux/Intel64.
> > Is there a known problem?
>
> It should work AFAIK. What kind of error did you g
2008/2/7 Tobias Grosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2. Which loops are part of a SCoP:
>
> At the moment we detect the loops, which are part of a SCoP like this:
>
> FORALL_BB_IN_SCOP(bb)
> {
> VEC_loops_add(bb->loop_father);
> }
>
> This seems incorrect if we look at this SCoP:
>
> h #loop0
> |
> a
> I tried to build Ada at trunk revision 131899 on Linux/ia32. It failed
> on RHEL4/ia32 and Fedora 8/ia32. But I can build Ada on Linux/Intel64.
> Is there a known problem?
It should work AFAIK. What kind of error did you get ?
Arno
I tried to build Ada at trunk revision 131899 on Linux/ia32. It failed
on RHEL4/ia32 and Fedora 8/ia32. But I can build Ada on Linux/Intel64.
Is there a known problem?
H.J.
Hi, Paolo,
Your suggestion was right !
I have made an additional define_insn with two SImode destination
registers and now the lower_subreg pass is able to substitute
the subregs, and re-recognize the obtained instruction.
One small modification to your proposal is that
I create the original
18 matches
Mail list logo
