On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:38:06PM +0100, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Is there summarized table of ABI binary compatibility of following
> compiled programs by ...?
>
> 1st. C (the core)
> 2nd. Fortran
> 3rd. C++
> and 4th. GCJ's Java
>
> between the 4.3.0, 4.2.3, 4.1.x, 4.0.x, 3.4.x and 3.
Richard Guenther wrote:
Status
==
We are in Stage 3 and the trunk is open for regression and documentation
fixes only. When we reach zero open P1 regressions, we will create a
release candidate for 4.3.0, branch and announce the opening of Stage 1
for 4.4.
make profiledbootstrap is still
J.C. Pizarro wrote:
2nd. Fortran
4.0.x: I don't know, but one should really not use that version
4,[1-3].x come with incompatible gfortran libraries, which have also
different version numbers: libgfortran.so.1 to libgfortran.so.3.
Minor versions are upward compatible, i.e. programs compiled wi
Hallo,
Is there summarized table of ABI binary compatibility of following
compiled programs by ...?
1st. C (the core)
2nd. Fortran
3rd. C++
and 4th. GCJ's Java
between the 4.3.0, 4.2.3, 4.1.x, 4.0.x, 3.4.x and 3.3.x versions?
The comments are not for me, they are for everyones who need
maintain
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
Great, we're making progress.
On mainline only (not 4.2 or prior) does this work instead?
Yep, trunk.
[ultra10:gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg] andreast% diff -u
/usr/include/iso/math_c99.h.orig /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h
--- /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h.origMon Feb 4 21:55
From: "Andreas Tobler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ultra10:gcc/gcc/testsuite] andreast% svn diff gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c
Index: gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c
===
--- gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c (revision 132096)
+++ gcc.dg/c99-math-double-
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
Okay, thanks both of you for tracking this down.
So the solaris definition of isinf is not exception-safe in the presence
of nans. Try inserting this code into c99-math-double-1.c after it
includes math headers. (This is what fixincludes puts into the header
for solar
From: "Andreas Tobler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rainer Orth wrote:
In c99-math-double-1.c, the first C99_MATH_TESTS invocation abort()s.
Single-stepping in gdb (which couldn't display the macro, even if
compiled
with -g3 ;-) revealed that this clause
if (fetestexcept (FE_ALL_EXCEPT) != 0) \
a
Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Kaveh,
I notice that the solaris_math_* fix hacks all seems to have a bypass clause
on "GNUC". Sometimes the solaris headers try to be gcc-aware. Is there a
GNUC appearing in solaris11's /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h header? And that
begs the question, why do these fix
Hi Kaveh,
> I notice that the solaris_math_* fix hacks all seems to have a bypass clause
> on "GNUC". Sometimes the solaris headers try to be gcc-aware. Is there a
> GNUC appearing in solaris11's /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h header? And that
> begs the question, why do these fix hacks have th
Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
> Well, since it's not working I guess something got lost in translation? I
> don't have access to solaris11, can you please help?
the libm sources, including math_c99.h, are available for download from
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/devpro/downloads/current/
R
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Well, since it's not working I guess something got lost in translation? I
> don't have access to solaris11, can you please help?
I don't have solaris11 either.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
