On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:46:12PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 16 January 2008 22:09, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> > On 1/16/08 4:16 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
> >> Because it's not a bug? You're changing the code to silence a false
> >> negative, which this is what we here in England call "puttin
On 18/01/2008, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, at the point of instantiation of Foo the friend is declared,
> and can then be found by ADL because Foo is an associated type.
> The reference parameter 'x' doesn't cause an instantiation, only 'weird' does.
Forgot the reference -
On 17/01/2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> Well, a language lawyer can probably clear things up. From a look
> at the std it looks like w/o a previous declaration the above should
> be invalid. And at a different point it suggests the decl becomes
> available.
Yes, at the point of instantiation
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:20:23AM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote:
> > My old email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], may no longer works. My
> > new email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Don't forget to update the MAINTAINERS file, HJ.
>
Hi Ben,
I updated my email address in MAINTAINERS in gcc, gdb and
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Taras Glek wrote:
| Major Issue: Specifying TFF_CHASE_TYPEDEFS as a parameter only works with
| top-level typenames because the C/C++ pretty printing code does not
| support/propagate the flags parameter. Is this considered a bug or a TODO?
| Would a patch to move the TFF* fla
I created gcc stack alignment branch to implement our proposal
to automatically align stack:
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/stack
I am enclosing the design document here. Joey, Xuepeng and I are
working on it. We will start sending patches to gcc-patches with
subject "[stack] x". We are t
Hi,
My old email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], may no longer works. My
new email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H.J.
Hi,
I am working on a static analysis plugin for Mozilla. I noticed the the
C++ frontend has a very convenient pretty-printing API exposed through
(decl|type)_as_string. I use decl_as_string() to get string
representations of types. The scripts are interested in both kinds of
types: the type n
On 17 Jan 2008 11:46:52 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Well, first I think you'd need friend-injection or otherwise a global
> > decl of the function.
>
> ADL works without friend injection. Look at 3.4.2
> [basic.looku
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Jan 17, 2008 2:12 PM, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > >> template
> > > > >> struct Foo
> > > > >> {
> > > > >> template
> > > > >> friend void func(const Foo &);
Dear all.
I am trying to obtain a libgcc_s.so.1 for IRIX. I have downloaded and
installed the fw_gcc-3.3.tardist, but the closest file to the one I want
is libgcc.a.
Could anybody help?
Thamks, João.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 05:48:10PM +0300, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> >Sergei Poselenov writes:
> > > Hello Andrew,
> > >
> > > > Now, I sympathize that in your particular case you have a code size
> > > > regression. This happens: when we do optimization in
On 17 Jan 2008 09:09:38 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Jan 17, 2008 2:12 PM, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > >> template
> > > >> struct Foo
> > > >> {
> >
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan 17, 2008 2:12 PM, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Richard Guenther wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >> template
> > >> struct Foo
> > >> {
> > >> template
> > >> friend void func(const Foo &);
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> void ch
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:08:25AM -0500, Ross Ridge wrote:
> Diego Novillo wrote:
> >I agree. Freeing memory right before we exit is a waste of time.
>
> Dave Korn writes:
> > So, no gcc without an MMU and virtual memory platform ever again?
> >Shame, it used to run on Amigas.
>
> I don't know
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:08:25AM -0500, Ross Ridge wrote:
> Diego Novillo wrote:
> >I agree. Freeing memory right before we exit is a waste of time.
>
> Dave Korn writes:
> > So, no gcc without an MMU and virtual memory platform ever again?
> >Shame, it used to run on Amigas.
>
> I don't know
Diego Novillo wrote:
>I agree. Freeing memory right before we exit is a waste of time.
Dave Korn writes:
> So, no gcc without an MMU and virtual memory platform ever again?
>Shame, it used to run on Amigas.
I don't know if GCC ever freed all of its memory before exiting.
An operating system does
> > I am trying to compile a java app. I don't have the script in front of
> > me that i am using because I am at a client's office right now. The
> > jist of
> > the command line is as follows:
> >
> > gcj -O -fjni -s -main=main.App --classpath=x1.jar x2.jar x3.jar x4.jar
> > x5.jar x6.jar
> "Dave" == Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> So, no gcc without an MMU and virtual memory platform ever
Dave> again? Shame, it used to run on Amigas.
If you are serious about doing a port like this, then I will recant
and support not only this patch, but all the other ones you wil
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:08:16AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Carlos O'Donell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Why is 16-bit int alignment the default for m68k in gcc?
> >
> > Which ABIs influenced this decision?
>
> The original ABI was defined by Sun PCC. Note that the SysV ABI
> actually
On Jan 17, 2008 3:48 PM, Sergei Poselenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> I agree. Actually, the CSiBE results are impressive: I've built the
> bzip2 library for powerpc and got similar results.
>
> I wonder why GCC maintainers are ignoring the -Os regression for
> most of their case
Hello Andrew,
Andrew Haley wrote:
Sergei Poselenov writes:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> > Now, I sympathize that in your particular case you have a code size
> > regression. This happens: when we do optimization in gcc, some code
> > bases will lose out. All that we can promise is that we try no
On 16 January 2008 22:09, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 1/16/08 4:16 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> Because it's not a bug? You're changing the code to silence a false
>> negative, which this is what we here in England call "putting the cart
>> before the horse." If we clean up all the memory regions
On Jan 17, 2008 2:12 PM, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> [snip]
> >> template
> >> struct Foo
> >> {
> >> template
> >> friend void func(const Foo &);
> >> };
> >>
> >> void check(const Foo & x)
> >> {
> >> // Foo weird; // uncomment this l
template
struct Foo
{
template
friend void func(const Foo &);
};
void check(const Foo & x)
{
// Foo weird; // uncomment this line and all works
func(x);// <-- ERROR
}
Tested with gcc 4.0 - 4.3, and all behave the same:
"error: 'func' was not declared in this scope
Richard Guenther wrote:
[snip]
template
struct Foo
{
template
friend void func(const Foo &);
};
void check(const Foo & x)
{
// Foo weird; // uncomment this line and all works
func(x);// <-- ERROR
}
Tested with gcc 4.0 - 4.3, and all behave the same:
"error: 'func'
Hello Sergei,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:13:59PM +0300, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
> I don't know now, actually, this is what I'm asking. As for the
> target processor - as I stated in the initial message:
>
> ...
> Currently, it builds as following:
> ppc-linux-gcc -g -Os -fPIC -ffixed-r14
On Jan 17, 2008 11:44 AM, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm aware about these issues being around for quite a while now, but
> there is still a chance this sample code can be helpful. I apologize
> if someone gets annoyed :-P
>
>
> template
> struct Foo
> {
> templ
Hello Gabriel,
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:55:19PM +0300, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
Hello,
I've just noted an error in my calculations: not 40%, but 10%
regression (used gdb to do the calculations and forgot to convert
inputs to float). Sorry.
But the problem still persist
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:55:19PM +0300, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just noted an error in my calculations: not 40%, but 10%
> regression (used gdb to do the calculations and forgot to convert
> inputs to float). Sorry.
>
> But the problem still persists for me - I'm building an e
Hello,
I'm aware about these issues being around for quite a while now, but
there is still a chance this sample code can be helpful. I apologize
if someone gets annoyed :-P
template
struct Foo
{
template
friend void func(const Foo &);
};
void check(const Foo & x)
{
// Foo weird;
31 matches
Mail list logo
