Hi,
When a loop is vectorized, some statements are removed from the basic
blocks, but the vectorizer information attached to these BBs is never
freed. This is because the attached information is freed by walking
the statements of the basic blocks: see tree-vectorizer.c:1750, but
the transformed c
Hi,
one more leak, this time in alias analysis that initializes an obstak
without freeing it. This is with the testcase of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23821
valgrind --leak-check=full cc1 -O2 pr23821.c
==16661== 9,244 bytes in 68 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 5
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
==14240==at 0x4A059F6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==14240==by 0xB2F778: __gmp_default_allocate (in /mnt/sdb2/obj43/gcc/f951)
==14240==by 0x4C2B62D: mpfr_init2 (init2.c:53)
==14240==by 0x4C34424: mpfr_cache (
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > ==14240==at 0x4A059F6: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
> > ==14240==by 0xB2F778: __gmp_default_allocate (in
> > /mnt/sdb2/obj43/gcc/f951)
> > ==14240==by 0x4C2B62D: mpfr_init2 (init2.c:53)
> > ==14240==by 0x4C34424: mpfr_cache (cach
Hello Everyone,
I am currently working on dividing the register file into two
different processing element. In the first processing element (PE) I
want to have certain operations (add, sub, mult, div, branch,
jumps..etc) in first PE and loads and stores should be in the 2nd
Processing Eleme
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
> Doing arithmetic on small bit-fields on the (larger) promoted type, but
> doing them on large bit-fields on the exact width creates an asymmetry.
It's the same as arithmetic on unsigned short actually being done on the
promoted type (signed int), whi
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > Can you clarify on the resulting promotions? As I remember the
> > standard defines promotions based on the representable values, so
> > long : 15 gets promoted to int, but long : 33 doesn't get
Harpal Grover writes:
> On Jan 14, 2008 5:09 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Harpal Grover writes:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I downloaded and built gcc 4.2.2 on my linux box. I have also used the
> > > sources to build a cross compiler using Ranjit's Matthews guide
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > Can you clarify on the resulting promotions? As I remember the
> > standard defines promotions based on the representable values, so
> > long : 15 gets promoted to int, but long : 33 doesn't get prom
