On 26/11/2007, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Template are tricky. During phase one, we usually do as much of
> semantics analysis as we can, e.g. non dependent things get checked.
> In phase two, we check only things that were dependent. So, if the
> enclosing function is genera
Current Physicians in the United States
788,263 in total <> 17,446 emails
34 primary and secondary specialties
Sort by over a dozen different fields
Dramatic cost reduction: $390
~ Get These Fr EE with every order this week ~
American Pharmaceutical Company Database
47,000 pers
On 14/01/2008, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13/01/2008, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I think all others should change to permerrors.
>
> I only meant all others in cp/decl.c of course - here are the remaining files.
> Again I've only listed the ones that should remain as pedwar
On 13/01/2008, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I think all others should change to permerrors.
I only meant all others in cp/decl.c of course - here are the remaining files.
Again I've only listed the ones that should remain as pedwarns and
other special cases - most change to permerrors.
In cp/error.
Hello
I want a new attribute in my port. This has to be dynamic like the
aligned attribute. So I registered a new handler in the attribute table
and was able to get the value inside the handler. But how can I use this
value in prologue or epilogue.
All tries to append this value to the functi
On 13/01/2008, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So we should should just let Manu finish up his patch and get a review as C++
> FE maintainers agreed as well.
>
Patch sent for approval: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00583.html
Extra testing is welcome in case I missed so
On 13/01/2008, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/01/2008, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/01/2008, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is an initial patch implementing some of your proposals. I used
> > > pederror as the name of
> Suppose we dump the GIMPLE tree into a file by using gcc option. Is it
> possible to import the GIMPLE file into the gcc and generate the target
> code?
No, but you might want to take a look at the plugin project:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_Plugins
Ben
Hello all,
I downloaded and built gcc 4.2.2 on my linux box. I have also used the
sources to build a cross compiler using Ranjit's Matthews guide. The
build went just fine. I tried to compile my java application and got
the following error:
c1: out of memory allocating 4064 bytes after a total o
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
| Sunday 13 January 2008 18:40:25 tarihinde Gabriel Dos Reis sunlar? yazm?st?:
| > | real life testcase shows that problem stems from
| > | autoconf and its config.h. Projects end up defining things like
| > | HAVE_STDLIB_H twice which is not harmful at al
Sunday 13 January 2008 18:40:25 tarihinde Gabriel Dos Reis şunları yazmıştı:
> | real life testcase shows that problem stems from
> | autoconf and its config.h. Projects end up defining things like
> | HAVE_STDLIB_H twice which is not harmful at all but now causes an error
> | if g++ is used.
>
> T
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
| Sunday 13 January 2008 17:41:03 tarihinde Gabriel Dos Reis sunlar? yazm?st?:
| > Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Hi again,
| > |
| > | Wednesday 09 January 2008 00:28:54 tarihinde Manuel López-Ibáñez sunlar?
| > |
| > | yazm?st?:
| > | >
Sunday 13 January 2008 18:10:00 tarihinde Richard Guenther şunları yazmıştı:
> On Jan 13, 2008 5:10 PM, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sunday 13 January 2008 18:03:20 tarihinde Andreas Schwab şunları yazmıştı:
> > > Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > That was just an ex
On Jan 13, 2008 5:10 PM, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sunday 13 January 2008 18:03:20 tarihinde Andreas Schwab şunları yazmıştı:
> > Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > That was just an example, real life testcase shows that problem stems
> > > from autoconf and its config
Sunday 13 January 2008 18:03:20 tarihinde Andreas Schwab şunları yazmıştı:
> Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That was just an example, real life testcase shows that problem stems
> > from autoconf and its config.h. Projects end up defining things like
> > HAVE_STDLIB_H twice which is
Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That was just an example, real life testcase shows that problem stems from
> autoconf and its config.h. Projects end up defining things like HAVE_STDLIB_H
> twice which is not harmful at all but now causes an error if g++ is used.
Redefinitions with t
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| "Doug Gregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > To make this discussion a bit more concrete, the attached patch
| > removes this particular warning from -Wparentheses and puts it into a
| > new warning, -Wprecedence, that is not enabled by -Wall. Thi
Sunday 13 January 2008 17:41:03 tarihinde Gabriel Dos Reis şunları yazmıştı:
> Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Hi again,
> |
> | Wednesday 09 January 2008 00:28:54 tarihinde Manuel López-Ibáñez şunları
> |
> | yazmıştı:
> | > For your particular example, you could open a regression bu
Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi again,
|
| Wednesday 09 January 2008 00:28:54 tarihinde Manuel López-Ibáñez şunları
| yazmıştı:
| > For your particular example, you could open a regression bug against
| > 4.3 that says:
| > * '"foo' redefined" is not mandated by the standard or it
19 matches
Mail list logo
