Is this a thread safe operation for your Ptolomy project?
Should you suspend the application in order to load 'new classes' there?
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
Buck
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 10:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Question is, whether this kind of rather large changes is acceptable
> for stage 3 or not. Me, I call it a "regression fix" if it reduces
> compile time. But I will not work on it now (or ask help from others)
> if it is a priori not acceptable for s
On 2007-11-16 19:33:38 -0500, Geert Bosch wrote:
> If a real number is rounded to the nearest number in a binary floating
> point format with 2*p+1 bits and that result rounded again to
> a p-bit float, the result is the same as if the original value was
> rounded to a p-bit float directly.
No, th
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17/11/2007, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm still seeing the same failure on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, is this
> > > going to get fixed?
> >
> > You're not supposed to configure the compiler with --disable-checking as
> > this
> >
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:31PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The amount of duplicate work done on RTL is sometimes really amazing,
> especially since the merge of the dataflow branch. Some of the people
> who have worked on the dataflow branch had hoped that other developers
> wo
On 17/11/2007, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm still seeing the same failure on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, is this
> > going to get fixed?
>
> You're not supposed to configure the compiler with --disable-checking as this
> disables the internal assertions, use --enable-checking=rele
> I'm still seeing the same failure on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, is this
> going to get fixed?
You're not supposed to configure the compiler with --disable-checking as this
disables the internal assertions, use --enable-checking=release instead.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 09/11/2007, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Builds today fail during stage2 when compiling 'reg-stack.c'
> >
> > $ make bootstrap-lean ...
> > { ... lots of stuff snipped ... }
> > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > /export/home/arth/gnu/gcc.git/gcc/reg-stack.c: In funct
My favorite example of this lack of follow-through is gcse.c. It
computes reg-def chains and monotonic insn IDs. Guess what df-scan
provides?
This is great. I did that for combine and CSE, but I didn't know GCSE
as well. From the description from my first read I like this patch, and
I thi
In local-alloc.c, block_alloc():
if (optimize
&& recog_data.n_operands > 1
&& recog_data.constraints[0][0] == '='
&& recog_data.constraints[0][1] != '&')
{
The documentation about "Constraint Modifier Characters" says:
10 matches
Mail list logo
