Hello,
On SPARC there is an ABI that is V8+ which allows the linking (and
mixing) of V8 ABI but makes uses of features of 64bit UltraSparc CPUs
(that were not available in the older 32bit only CPUs). Admittedly
looking at the way this works it could be said that Sun had a certain
about of
> I am currently looking for a topic for graduation thesis. I would
> like it to be in the area of GCC code generation enhancements, and my
> current best choice is providing predication support in selective
> scheduling. If you have anything to suggest, I will be very glad to
> hear; or maybe yo
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 18:28 -0500, Steve Kenton wrote:
> If so, who should these sort of patches be coordinated with?
> I did not find a maintainer listed for the top level configure.
build machinery (*.in) Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
build machinery (*.in) DJ Delorie
While digging through the top level configure researching my
inhibit_libc changes
I realized that there are some non-obvious ways to shoot yourself in the
foot.
For example, the build-sysroot parameter parsing in gcc-4.3-20071012 has the
following code fragment. It looks like specifying
--with
[ Omitting gcc-patches ]
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> I think that if indeed metahtml is in such a bad shape as you
> describe, moving away from it asap is the right thing to do. But I'm
> not convinced that developing a gcc.gnu.org-specific template engine
> is the correct answer
