bootstrapping with Sun Studio 8 thus :
bash-3.2$ cc -V
cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-18 2005/06/14
usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details
bash-3.2$ CC -V
CC: Sun C++ 5.5 Patch 113817-20 2007/04/24
All tools in the toolpath were built up to date and passed their
testsuites. Typical
bootstrapping with Sun Studio 8 thus :
bash-3.2$ cc -V
cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-18 2005/06/14
usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details
bash-3.2$ CC -V
CC: Sun C++ 5.5 Patch 113817-20 2007/04/24
All tools in the toolpath were built up to date and passed their testsuites.
Typical
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the bootstrap failure you are seeing is caused by my decompose
> multiword shift patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00419.html
>
> It is the same failure as reported by Andreas Tobler:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/20
> I don't know about using reference types, but there are several math
> builtins that "return" multiple values, the extra ones via pointer
> arguments. E.g. see frexp, lgamma_r, modf, remquo and/or sincos.
Like I said, I'm kinda locked into the syntax. People have been using
these builtins for
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Could someone provide a hint for me? I'm trying to put in "real"
> prototypes for a builtin function where the arguments don't follow the
> default promotion rules. Specifically, one of the arguments is a
> reference type (like C++'s "int&"). However, I'm
Summary
---
We entered Stage 2 on July 6th. I plan to put us into Stage 3 on
September 10th. At that point, we will accept only bug-fixes -- no
more new features until Stage 1 for GCC 4.4.
Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2
that they are having trouble g
On 8/9/07, Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/9/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> > >> This is the source of my current woes, as this may involve virtual
> > >> function resolution, which can't be done with the information
> > >> currently availab
I'm hoping I can get it to do what I want, if only I can get the MI to
treat the function definition given to it by the target as the one
true definition, and not just some advisory one.
On 8/9/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:29:28PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > Also in Java it is possible to devirtualize calls in some situations
> > where only a bound on the type is known. For instance at a call site
> > we might know that all possible targets
Somebody signed up gcc@gcc.gnu.org to gmail.
Bad sign.
- Original Message -
From: "Gmail Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "django porter"
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 6:21 PM
Subject: Your Gmail account, [EMAIL PROTECTED], has been created
Congratulations on creating your brand new Gmail account,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please keep this email
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a trick to this? I need this type of functionality because
> some builtins modify multiple values, so a simple return value is
> insufficient, plus this worked with older versions of gcc so our users
> are used to it syntax-wise.
I've never found
On 8/9/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> >> This is the source of my current woes, as this may involve virtual
> >> function resolution, which can't be done with the information
> >> currently available to the middle end.
>
> Ollie, IIRC, you posted an example
Congratulations on creating your brand new Gmail account,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please keep this email for your records, as it contains an
important verification code that you may need should you ever
encounter problems or forget your password.
You can login to your account at http://mail.google.com/
Andreas Meier wrote:
> You have forgotten the regressions with target milestone 4.2.1 and
> without a target milestone.
Thank you for pointing that out. The omission of 4.2.1 is definitely
wrong, and I have fixed the front page with this patch. However, there
should be no regressions without a
Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> This is the source of my current woes, as this may involve virtual
>> function resolution, which can't be done with the information
>> currently available to the middle end.
Ollie, IIRC, you posted an example where, together with your front-end
lowering patch (i.e., with t
On 8/9/07 4:09 PM, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Does anyone know where the code is that does this transformation so I
> can look for myself?
The conversion to GIMPLE does some of that, then the lowering into Low
GIMPLE and the CFG cleanups do the rest. The files you want to look at
are gimplify.c for all
Hi,
I've been looking at the cfg that gcc dumps to a file. I'm noticing that
the code is transformed in the cfg. Especially the short circuited
expressions and the ternary operator for C/C++. Is there a particular
algorithm gcc uses to transform the original AST into the modified version
in the
Could someone provide a hint for me? I'm trying to put in "real"
prototypes for a builtin function where the arguments don't follow the
default promotion rules. Specifically, one of the arguments is a
reference type (like C++'s "int&"). However, I'm bumping into two
problems:
1. The compiler e
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:11:34PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:29:28PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > Also in Java it is possible to devirtualize calls in some situations
> > where only a bound on the type is known. For instance at a call site
> > we might know that all possi
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:29:28PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Also in Java it is possible to devirtualize calls in some situations
> where only a bound on the type is known. For instance at a call site
> we might know that all possible targets are derived from a class where
> the virtual method is
> "Michael" == Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Yes, devirtualization. But I wonder if you really need class
Michael> hierarchies for this (actually I'm fairly sure you don't).
I'm generally in favor of what you talked about in this note and
others, and also Danny's overall
> "Ollie" == Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ollie> 1. Is pointer to member migration worthwhile? Can other languages
Ollie> besides C++ benefit from this?
Not Java. You might ask Andrea about CLR though.
Ollie> 4. Is a migration of virtual functions and virtual function tables
Ol
FX Coudert wrote:
>
> My automated nightly build failed to bootstrap this evening on i386-
> pc-linux-gnu. This is for trunk rev. 127311, and the error is:
>
> > /home/fx/gfortran_nightbuild/ibin-20070809/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/
> > fx/gfortran_nightbuild/ibin-2007080
On Thursday 09 August 2007, Alex Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll try to come up with a short test.
>
> I have narrowed it a bit more. The PVAR structure contains a long long
> variable ( with a sizeof 8 and an alignof 8 for my architecture). If I
> take out the long long variable, the compiler uses
Hi,
I'll try to come up with a short test.
I have narrowed it a bit more. The PVAR structure contains a long long
variable ( with a sizeof 8 and an alignof 8 for my architecture). If I
take out the long long variable, the compiler uses sdl instructions
instead of sd and the exception doesn't happ
Alex Gonzalez wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing an address error exception caused by the gcc optimizer -O1.
I have narrowed it down to the following function:
static void varcopy(PVAR *pvar1, PVAR *pvar2) {
memcpy(pvar1,pvar2,sizeof(PVAR));
}
Being the sizeof(PVAR) 160 bytes.
The exception is cause
"Alex Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was under the assumption that the compiler made sure that it doesn't
> store a doubleword that is not aligned on a doubleword boundary. Is
> this a bug in the optimizer?
If the pointers are not correctly aligned for their target type then you
are in
Hi,
I am seeing an address error exception caused by the gcc optimizer -O1.
I have narrowed it down to the following function:
static void varcopy(PVAR *pvar1, PVAR *pvar2) {
memcpy(pvar1,pvar2,sizeof(PVAR));
}
Being the sizeof(PVAR) 160 bytes.
The exception is caused on an sd instruction
On 09 August 2007 14:39, Christian Joensson wrote:
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c: In function 'initializer_zerop':
> ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:7694: error: passing argument 1 of 'fixed_zerop'
> discards qualifiers from pointer target type
> make[3]: *** [tree.o] Error 1
Windows XP Pro/SP2 cygwin Pentium M processor 2.13GHz system with packages:
binutils 20060817-1 2.17.50 20060817
bison2.3-1 2.3
cygwin 1.5.24-2 (rev. 1.46 of newlib's stdio.h)
dejagnu 20021217-2 1.4.2.x
expect
Hello,
the bootstrap failure you are seeing is caused by my decompose
multiword shift patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00419.html
It is the same failure as reported by Andreas Tobler:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00533.html
I don't have access to a sparc machin
On 09 August 2007 13:25, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:49:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>> Yes, absolutely so, we already know that there are problems there. For
>> references, see the threads "Deep CSE bug!"[*] and "Bogus REG_EQUIV note
>> generation"[**] (sub
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:49:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> Yes, absolutely so, we already know that there are problems there. For
> references, see the threads "Deep CSE bug!"[*] and "Bogus REG_EQUIV note
> generation"[**] (subject line was wrong, should have been REG_EQUAL all along)
> fro
Here is the answer.
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: August 9, 2007 2:31:08 AM CEDT
To: "Cupertino Miranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fixed function compilation order
On 8/8/07, Cupertino Miranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 9, 2007, at 2:0
Yesterday by mistake I started some private discussion with Daniel.
I will forward his answer too.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Cupertino Miranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: August 9, 2007 2:24:04 AM CEDT
To: Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fixed function compilation order
On A
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.99 (Angel)/TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.17.50.0.3-6.sparc.sparc
bison-2.3-2.1.sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-5.1.noarch
expect-5.43.0-5.1.sparc
gcc-4.1.1-30.1.sparc
glibc-2.5-3.1.sparcv9
glibc-2.5-3.1.sparc64
glibc-devel-2.5-3.1.sparc
glibc-devel-2.5-3.1.sparc64
gl
My automated nightly build failed to bootstrap this evening on i386-
pc-linux-gnu. This is for trunk rev. 127311, and the error is:
/home/fx/gfortran_nightbuild/ibin-20070809/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/
fx/gfortran_nightbuild/ibin-20070809/./prev-gcc/ -B/home/fx/
gfortran_nightbuild/irun
On 8/8/07, Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I also haven't necessarily said what Ollie has proposed is a bad idea.
> > I have simply said the way he has come up with what he proposed is
> > not the way we should go about this. It may
39 matches
Mail list logo
