On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 07:39:56PM -0700, Marc Alff wrote:
> I have some questions regarding GCOV, which is part of GCC.
> I hope this is the right place (if not, suggestions are welcome).
Your questions are basically legal, and we don't really have the
competence on this list to address them.
I
Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> 2006/6/18, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Are you trying to do incremental marking?
>> If the root set changes in the middle of an incremental mark and it's
>> still got things from the old root set to mark, i bet it blows up, :)
>
> I thought I was safe with disa
Hi All.
I have some questions regarding GCOV, which is part of GCC.
I hope this is the right place (if not, suggestions are welcome).
Please add me (marc dot alff at comcast dot net) in your replies, as I
am not subscribed to this list.
Let me start with some background :
A project "XYZ" consi
2006/6/18, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Are you trying to do incremental marking?
If the root set changes in the middle of an incremental mark and it's
still got things from the old root set to mark, i bet it blows up, :)
I thought I was safe with disabled incremental collection.
Addition
Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So far I've been debugging GCC bootstrap failures with Boehm's GC, and
> now I'm stuck.
>
> I used to register all GC roots at the startup of GCC, including
> stringpool roots. That worked fine until first ht_expand() call, which
> moves identifier hash table ar
On 6/17/06, Piotr Pałka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I need first to compile binutils for the same target as gcc?
You should probably read http://gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html.
Gr.
Steven
Hello,
I Am trying to compile my gcc source as cross compiler. I tryied to compile
for pdp10, crx, mips and I still get the same error:
Make[2]: *** No rules to make object `/usr/local/bin/crx-as', needed by
`stamp-as'. Stop.
Make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/piotrek/Desktop/umik/objdir/gcc'
Make[
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060617 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060617/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On 16 Jun 2006 14:12:29 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The RDHWR is executed _before_ evaluating the "arg" value. For arg ==
> > 0 case, the RDHWR has no point but just a overhead. Without -O2, the
> > RDHWR is executed _after_ the evaluation, so gcc's optimizer reorder
>
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Thomas Neumann wrote:
> how about using a svg image as a master instead of a png? It could be
> scaled without loss. I attached a svg produced from the original png.
Thanks, Thomas! I've now put this into our CVS (as
wwwdocs:htdocs/img/gccegg.svg) so that we can use this in
On 6/17/06, Bernhard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
first of all, my best regards for the developers of gcc, it is a very
big and great piece of work, I appreciate it much and use it
frequently.
First of all, this is off-topic on this list. Use gcc-help or better
comp.lang.c++ for
Hello,
first of all, my best regards for the developers of gcc, it is a very
big and great piece of work, I appreciate it much and use it
frequently.
I am very curios over a piece of code I wrote recently.
In a slight variation it produces a compile error from g++ and I
have no idea if
i) I do
I'm looking at the very same problem, hoping to get very lightweight
user-level threads for use in discrete event simulation.
It would be very nice if it was possible to write an inlined piece of
assembler that saved the program counter and the stack pointer and
then be able to say to GCC t
Hi,
So far I've been debugging GCC bootstrap failures with Boehm's GC, and
now I'm stuck.
I used to register all GC roots at the startup of GCC, including
stringpool roots. That worked fine until first ht_expand() call, which
moves identifier hash table around in the memory and Boehm's GC still
Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dustin Laurence writes:
| > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:05:13PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
| >
| > > If every language were going to have the feature, then, moving it
| > > down into the mid-end or back-end might make sense, but I don't think
| > >
Dustin Laurence writes:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:05:13PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> > If every language were going to have the feature, then, moving it
> > down into the mid-end or back-end might make sense, but I don't think
> > it does in this case.
>
> Personally, I'd like, an
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> The rest of the ARM backend presently assumes that the pattern has the form
>
> (set (operand:QI 0) (operand:QI 1))
>
> but now we've changed it to
>
> (parallel [(set (operand:QI 0) (operand:QI 1))
> (clobber
17 matches
Mail list logo
