Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion

2006-06-10 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | (b) keep the warnings of conversions that may change a value in | Wconversion and move its original purpose (the warnings about | prototypes causing ... in the absence of a prototype) to a new option | (suggestions are welcome). I prefer

Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site

2006-06-10 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Attach is what I see currently on the web page, the news is down low in the > lower right. > Barely noticeable. Ack. Would you mind sending another screenshot tomorrow evening your time? ;-) Gerald

Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site

2006-06-10 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Joe Buck wrote: >> Also what about moving the News up to a noticeable spot since right now >> it is down in a corner so it looks out of place. In fact on my screen >> which is set to 1024x768, I have to scroll to get to the news. > Yes, the top news needs to be on the front pag

Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion

2006-06-10 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Jun 10, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: On 09/06/06, Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think I like b) the most. That way people who are accustomed to using -Wconversion for value conversions can continue doing so and we can move to something like -Wprototype-conve

Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion

2006-06-10 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 09/06/06, Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think I like b) the most. That way people who are accustomed to using -Wconversion for value conversions can continue doing so and we can move to something like -Wprototype-conversion or something for the other (and stick the second in -

Re: Highlevel C Backend

2006-06-10 Thread Paul Brook
> One imagines that one would construct a virtual machine architecture > framework gcc already has one. It's called RTL. > and then write a back-end that would generate "machine code" for > that virtual machine, which would be a subset of ANSI C. Hey-presto, you > then have a butt-ugly anythin

Re: Some C++0x experiments

2006-06-10 Thread Howard Hinnant
On Jun 9, 2006, at 9:31 PM, Pedro Lamarão wrote: Any feedback is welcome! Thank you! -Howard

gcc-4.2-20060610 is now available

2006-06-10 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060610 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060610/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all)

2006-06-10 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Pinski writes: > > On Jun 10, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > Andrew, > > What is the release branch called? I can't get anything pulled > > down with... > > There is no release branch but the release branch rules are in effect > on the mainline (trunk). >

Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all)

2006-06-10 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Jun 10, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Andrew, What is the release branch called? I can't get anything pulled down with... There is no release branch but the release branch rules are in effect on the mainline (trunk). See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00120.html --

Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all)

2006-06-10 Thread Jack Howarth
Andrew, What is the release branch called? I can't get anything pulled down with... svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_2-branch gcc Our isn't it in the svn repository yet. Jack

Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all)

2006-06-10 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Jun 10, 2006, at 12:23 AM, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: Andrew Pinski wrote: Caused by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-06/msg00225.html I committed this fix. Did you know trunk of GCC is in release branch and has been since Thursday? -- Pinski

Re: GIMPLE / induction variable analysis

2006-06-10 Thread Jay L.T. Cornwall
Hi, Thanks for your replies, scalar evolution is what I was looking for! -- Jay L.T. Cornwall, http://www.esuna.co.uk/~jay/ PhD Student Imperial College London

Re: Errors while building bootstrap GCC for "mipsisa32-elf" target

2006-06-10 Thread Andreas Schwab
"Monika Sapra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the reply. I have tried this but when I check out GCC source > using SVN, It is 1.38 GB. Try upgrading subversion. With version 1.3+, the checked out tree is only about half the size. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: GIMPLE / induction variable analysis

2006-06-10 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, > I'm looking for an induction variable analysis which will operate at the > GIMPLE level. So far, I've found... > > loop-iv.c -- RTL induction variable analysis > tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c -- GIMPLE induction variable analysis no, tree-level induction variable analysis is in tree-scalar-ev

Re: Errors while building bootstrap GCC for "mipsisa32-elf" target

2006-06-10 Thread Mike Stump
On Jun 10, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Monika Sapra wrote: Thanks for the reply. I have tried this but when I check out GCC source using SVN, It is 1.38 GB. I have space problem on my system so it is difficult to check out all supported tool sources and make combined tree. Ha, that's nothing, you sh

RE: Errors while building bootstrap GCC for "mipsisa32-elf" target

2006-06-10 Thread Monika Sapra
Thanks for the reply. I have tried this but when I check out GCC source using SVN, It is 1.38 GB. I have space problem on my system so it is difficult to check out all supported tool sources and make combined tree. I am not able to understand, why the checkout source of GCC is so large in size? I

Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all)

2006-06-10 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
Andrew Pinski wrote: Caused by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-06/msg00225.html I committed this fix. Tom 2006-06-10 Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * configure.ac (ac_configure_args): Add --disable-plugin. (--enable-gtk-cairo): Remove option. * configure