Re: Segment registers support for i386

2006-05-28 Thread Rémy Saissy
Ross Ridge wrote: You won't be able to. You're going to need to write your own code that, during the conversion of the tree to RTL, creates RTL expressions which indicate that the memory references use segment registers. This probably won't be easy since there are a lot of contexts w

Errors while building bootstrap GCC for "mipsisa32-elf" target

2006-05-28 Thread Monika Sapra
Hi all, I am new to this list and GCC compiler. I am trying to build GCC4.1.0 for "mipsisa32-elf" target. I would appreciate if someone could help me out in resolving the errors during build process. The detail is as follows: OS: Fedora core5 Default GCC compiler installed on system: gcc 4.1.0

Re: An assortment of questions

2006-05-28 Thread Mike Stump
On May 28, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Loren Wilton wrote: I'm looking at the need to build a very comprehensive code optimizer and generator for a very strange (antique but still used mainframe) machine. Which machine out of curiosity?

Re: Does anyone have Vlad's CSE speedup patches from many years ago

2006-05-28 Thread Vladimir N. Makarov
Steven Bosscher wrote: Hello, When fwprop gets approved, CSE path following will disappear. We lose virtually no optimization opportunities. Still, it should not be very hard to make CSE work on extended basic blocks (but without rescanning like path following does). All that would be needed

Does anyone have Vlad's CSE speedup patches from many years ago

2006-05-28 Thread Steven Bosscher
Hello, When fwprop gets approved, CSE path following will disappear. We lose virtually no optimization opportunities. Still, it should not be very hard to make CSE work on extended basic blocks (but without rescanning like path following does). All that would be needed is infrastructure in cse.

Re: configure: error: expected an absolute directory name for --prefix

2006-05-28 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
Thanks Andrew, that is exactly what I did, although I was expecting configure to be smart enough to use that trick on my behalf. On 28/05/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On May 28, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > Dear all, > > Doesn't autotools support relative path

Re: configure: error: expected an absolute directory name for --prefix

2006-05-28 Thread Andrew Pinski
On May 28, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: Dear all, Doesn't autotools support relative paths in configure? The reason why you cannot pass relative paths for --prefix is because --prefix is passed down to all of the makefiles and others which is going to have the wrong prefi

configure: error: expected an absolute directory name for --prefix

2006-05-28 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
Dear all, Doesn't autotools support relative paths in configure? Or is this a particular issue of GCC's build system? Cheers, Manuel.

Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help

2006-05-28 Thread Wolfgang Mües
Hello, I am trying to port big C/C++ programs (see www.dslinux.org) to the nintendo DS console. The console has 4 Mbytes internal memory, and 32 MBytes external memory which is *not* 8bit writable (only 16 and 32 bits). CPU is an ARM 946. Using the external memory for ROM(XIP) and the internal

"Authorization failed" for commit?

2006-05-28 Thread Thomas Koenig
I just tried to commit the fix for PR 27470, a gfortran 4.1 regression, and I got the error message: $ svn commit fortran/ChangeLog fortran/trans-array.c testsuite/ChangeLog testsuite/gfortran.dg/multiple_allocation_2.f90 Waiting for Emacs...Done svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Authoriz

Re: An assortment of questions

2006-05-28 Thread Paul Brook
> The machine is very strange in modern terms.  It doesn't have registers, it > executes code in reverse Polish, the integer data type is a degenerate form > of the floating point data type, pointers are magic, there are no page > tables, and the word size isn't a power of 2, just to start.  Oh, an

Re: Can't commit to gcc-4.1

2006-05-28 Thread Thomas Koenig
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:43:20PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:38:34PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Is anything wrong with SVN, or did my authorization to commit somehow > > fall through the cracks? > > Is it maybe an anonymous checkout? Check svn info. That w

Re: Can't commit to gcc-4.1

2006-05-28 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:38:34PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Is anything wrong with SVN, or did my authorization to commit somehow > fall through the cracks? Is it maybe an anonymous checkout? Check svn info. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery

Can't commit to gcc-4.1

2006-05-28 Thread Thomas Koenig
Is anything wrong with SVN, or did my authorization to commit somehow fall through the cracks? Thomas $ svn commit fortran/ChangeLog fortran/trans-array.c testsuite/ChangeLog testsuite/gfortran.dg/multiple_allocation_2.f90 Waiting for Emacs...Done svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn

An assortment of questions

2006-05-28 Thread Loren Wilton
Hello. This is my first post to this list, so I apologise in advance if I get any of the 'stupid newbie' things wrong in this post. I have spent a while reading the last month's archive. I'm looking at the need to build a very comprehensive code optimizer and generator for a very strange (antiqu