gcc-4.1-20060512 is now available

2006-05-12 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20060512 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20060512/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: GCC-4.1 -fno-function-cse still supported?

2006-05-12 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 08:40:07PM +0200, Etienne Lorrain wrote: > But when I tried (replacing in Gujin some calll by lcallw based on which > function > is called) it did not work as I expected it. For instance, -fno-function-cse > seem > ignored here: What are you expecting to happen here?

GCC-4.1 -fno-function-cse still supported?

2006-05-12 Thread Etienne Lorrain
Hello, the docs for "-fno-function-cse" says: `-fno-function-cse' Do not put function addresses in registers; make each instruction that calls a constant function contain the function's address explicitly. This option results in less efficient code, but some strange hacks

Re: how to make gcc stop when there is a warning

2006-05-12 Thread lopezibanez
Richard, if the documentation would have said explicitly that Werror "makes warnings to prevent compilation", would you have understood it better? One proposal: -Werror makes all warnings into errors, preventing compilation (see also -Wfatal-errors). On 12/05/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROT

Re: how to make gcc stop when there is a warning

2006-05-12 Thread Richard Guenther
On 5/12/06, D. Ensign <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to tell gcc to quit when a warning is encountered > > (or even if a specific warning is encountered). Is there a way to do > > this? > > Yes. -Werror. If you can tell us why you weren't able to find it in > the documentation, perhaps