On 5/1/06, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any ideas?
Re-run the testsuite, they most likely will disappear.
right... I somehow had memory kernel related issues... A new one now... c9a011b
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Stump wrote:
> It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
>
You obviously have not read the documentation nor browsed the GCC wiki.
Doing merges with svn is amazingly simple.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEV
On 5/2/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
Just because you can't do it, doesn't mean svn can't do it. Other
people have been maintaining branches with svn for months now without
trouble.
Gr.
Steven
> Well, conceptually, I want the history for the file, hence the cp. I
> was trying to get around yet another svn bug that causes checkins of
> merge products to fail.
What bugs?
If you file them, and tell us how to reproduce them, maybe we could fix
them?
> It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
That's patently inaccurate.
Have you tried using the svnmerge script that uses SVN properties to
remember which changesets you have (and haven't) merged?
Ben
On May 1, 2006, at 7:43 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
What exactly are you trying to achieve?
The first order operation is is a new fangled concept called a
merge. The second order operation is to dig out from under svn bugs
with additional commands to get the state of the working copy
correct,
> mrs $ svn cp -r113703 svn+ssh://src.apple.com/svn/fsf-gcc/gcc/
> branches/apple-local-200502-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/
> bitreverse-10.C bitreverse-10.C
> svn: Entry for 'bitreverse-10.C' exists (though the working file is
> missing)
>
> How do I `fix' this. I know how to fix it with multiple
svn is giving me grief, I'm merging and getting:
mrs $ svn cp -r113703 svn+ssh://src.apple.com/svn/fsf-gcc/gcc/
branches/apple-local-200502-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/
bitreverse-10.C bitreverse-10.C
svn: Entry for 'bitreverse-10.C' exists (though the working file is
missing)
mrs $ svn add
> gcc:version 4.02
> target: DLX CPU (port in progress)
>
> Does anyone have an idea what can cause this?
> Is this a bug in gcc or in target cpu files?
It's almost certainly a bug in your target files. The quickest course
of action would be to run cc1 under gdb, feed it with the same sourc
On May 1, 2006, at 1:26 PM, David Desimone wrote:
I have a hex file that i want to read and then write to another
file and preserve the hex info.
Wrong list.
On Apr 29, 2006, at 7:45 AM, Manfred von Willich wrote:
Any interested GCC maintainers/contributors:
I'd encourage you to work up a solid proposal for ISO/ANSI and
propose it there. Some of the issues you bring up have already been
discussed in that forum and decided, I'd doubt that they'd
On Mon, 2006-05-01 14:43:06 -0400, Bill Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to know who supports pdp11 for 3.4.6 or even the latest 4.x
> version of gcc? Is it still being maintained ? I'm trying to cross compile a
> pdp11 on my i686 and I'm having problems. If I can talk to th
I have a hex file that i want to read and then write to another file and
preserve the hex info.
What is the best approach?
thanks,
**
David DeSimone
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Advanced Nuclear Technology N-2
Mail stop: B228
Los Alamos, NM 87545
phone: (50
I'd like to extend the FPSCR support functions in SH's libgcc.a to
include a way for applications to change the bits that GCC doesn't
care about (exception handling, denormals, etc). I've come up with
this routine and (after much head-banging) managed to test it on real
hardware. The idea is tha
Hello,
As a quick reminder, the problem that I encountered arised when trying
to compile source files that are NOT encoded with the same encoding as
the system header files. My current Linux machine uses UTF-8, but I am
trying to compile files that were created using Windows "unicode".
To ma
I would like to know who supports pdp11 for 3.4.6 or even the latest 4.x
version of gcc? Is it still being maintained ? I'm trying to cross compile a
pdp11 on my i686 and I'm having problems. If I can talk to the maintainer(s)
I can get some help and maybe even get involved in pdp11 support.
B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The x86 box that runs SPEC2000 daily has hardware problems. It will be
looked at sometime this week, but I'm not sure when it will be back online.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEVjI/UTa2oAUaiwQRAlCAAKCcy/Ueea
> Any ideas?
Re-run the testsuite, they most likely will disappear.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3)/TI UltraSparc IIi
(Sabre) sun4u, I get two new failures...
splitting
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/c6/c64103b.ada
into:
c64103b.adb
BUILD c64103b.adb
gnatmake --GCC="/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/sr
Hi Daniel,
I have already reported this bug. The bug number is #27363.
I also tried the gcc snapshot 4.1.1-20060421. The bug is not
fixed in this version too.
Thanks & Regards
yfw
On 5/1/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:03:05AM +0800, Fengwei Yin wrote
20 matches
Mail list logo
