Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> It seems like we're getting consensus around that approach, despite the
>> initial sentiment in the other direction from Mike and Joe. Mike, Joe,
>> do either of you care to argue the point? If not, I'll volunteer to
>> write so
We had ported gcc-3.4.2 to our own RISC, and meet a strange
case in optimization level 3 (-O3).
The compiler produce wrong assembly code in O3 and
correct result if we add -fno-inline flag.
It seems that there some problem in function in-lining.
What can I do and what should I do to solve this pr
Hello - this is definitely a newbie question, so bear with me...
We've been using gcc under Solaris on SPARC hardware for some time now. The
guy who was here before me set up the previous version (gcc-3.3.3) and now
I'm trying to get gcc-3.4.4 to build.
In the old gcc-3.3.3 install tree, I h
It's that time again... I just want to ask if there's any progress on
Ada being multilibbed?
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
I'm behind on two RM duties: bug priorities and status reports.
Fortunately, I'm not traveling this week, so I'll get caught up shortly.
I just wanted to let everyone know that I'd not forgotten there's stuff
to be done...
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x
I suppose I should summarize what this problem was in case it's useful
to anyone else searching the archives.
A buggy cross-build process did not create libc.so.
The static linker didn't find libc.so so it silently used libc.a
instead.
Libc.a is not built with -fPIC so the load problem showed up.
Hi,
OpenMP is currently more or less unusable with the C++ front-end
because of EH issues (see PR26823). This unfortunate situation
is dragging on for more than two months now and makes further
testing impossible.
Some of the problems were fixed in PR26084, some still remain:
The original (unredu
On 12 April 2006 06:48, Frank Riese wrote:
> Yes, you're right. When I started writing this backend I didn't have much
> experience with it. I took the smallest backend I could find and tried to
> adjust it to me needs. The number of macros in the internals docs was a bit
> overwhelming at first a
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 07:47:32AM +0200, Frank Riese wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 19:48, you wrote:
> > Can it at least add (small) immediates to registers?
>
> Nope, sry. The only instructions that take other arguments than registers are
> the aforementioned LDL/LDH (load low/high), branch
On 12 April 2006 10:14, Eric Fisher wrote:
> hi,
> When I build gcc-3.2.2 for mips target, there's an error. What's the
> problem?
>
> Thanks
> Eirc
>
> ake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/cii/qwang_gcc/libiberty'
> xgcc: specs file malformed after 4096 characters
> xgcc: specs file malformed afte
hi,
When I build gcc-3.2.2 for mips target, there's an error. What's the problem?
Thanks
Eirc
ake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/cii/qwang_gcc/libiberty'
xgcc: specs file malformed after 4096 characters
xgcc: specs file malformed after 4096 characters
xgcc: specs file malformed after 4096 character
Piotr Marasz wrote:
I try compile example program
gcc.exe -I"c:\gcc\include" -L"c:\gcc\lib" c:\gcc\bin\program.c
gcc.exe: Internal error: (null) (program as)
Please submit bug report.
First the bug report should not go here but to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla (this is a list for development of
12 matches
Mail list logo