This 512 byte structure is saved by using the ia32
fxsave instruction.
Thanks,
Cristiano.
> I want to use the 512 byte structure which saves the
> floating point register state and convert it into a
> simulator that uses "long double" to represent each
> st(i) register. Each "st" register is repr
Hi all,
This may be a silly question but I am a little bit
stuck on it.
I want to use the 512 byte structure which saves the
floating point register state and convert it into a
simulator that uses "long double" to represent each
st(i) register. Each "st" register is represented as a
16 bytes wit
Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Roberto Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi there,
I have read the files darwin-ldouble* in GCC 4.1.0.
What I would like do know is whether I can expect
long doubles on Darwin to comply with ISO C99 7.6
(Floating-point environment).
They can be made compliant with
I'm sending this note again since I have been caught in this bug once
more. Under Darwin (PPC and Intel) there is a serious memory leak at
every Boehm GC cycle. See discussion and patch here:
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2005-December/
001071.html
I think that the pa
Mark, can you please update http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline
and add more dates for GCC 4.2 and include 4.3.
Thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060408 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060408/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Le vendredi 07 avril 2006 à 02:54 -0500, Aaron W. LaFramboise a écrit :
> I have also recently become interested in a GCC port for the 18F.
>
> Can someone summarize who--if anyone--is working on this, how much
> progress he has made so far (Is his work based on mainline?), and any
> expected fu
* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 11:07]:
> > "weird structure" have a sub-dir for every release, and are missing
> > some of the other dirs (e.g. infrastructure).
> That means they mirror from ftp.gnu.org, rather than gcc.gnu.org.
Right, but should they all be in the same listin
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 05:02:28PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 16:15]:
> > > ftp://core.ring.gr.jp/pub/GNU/gcc/ - has no snapshots (and has weird
> > > structure)
> > > ftp://ftp.ring.gr.jp/pub/GNU/gcc/ - has no snapshots (and has weird
> > >
* Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 16:15]:
> > ftp://core.ring.gr.jp/pub/GNU/gcc/ - has no snapshots (and has weird
> > structure)
> > ftp://ftp.ring.gr.jp/pub/GNU/gcc/ - has no snapshots (and has weird
> > structure)
>
> (When you refer to "weird structure", is this about gcc3.3 r
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I found problems with the following mirrors:
>
> ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/ - no longer has a GCC mirror
Thanks for the hint; I just removed this server from our mirrors list.
> ftp://ftp.uvsq.fr/pub/gcc/ - unreachable
> ftp://ftp.club-internet.
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html lists a number of mirrors that are no
> longer reachable, doesn't mention that certain mirrors don't have
> snapshots, etc. Can you please investigate.
>
> I found problems with the following mirrors:
> [...]
> ftp://ft
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html lists a number of mirrors that are no
> longer reachable, doesn't mention that certain mirrors don't have
> snapshots, etc. Can you please investigate.
>
> I found problems with the following mirrors:
> [...]
> ftp://ft
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html lists a number of mirrors that are no
longer reachable, doesn't mention that certain mirrors don't have
snapshots, etc. Can you please investigate.
I found problems with the following mirrors:
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/ - no longer has a GCC mirror
ftp://ftp.
Hi Jonas,
Thanks for this confirmation. To accelerate my processing of these
papers, would it be possible to already have an electronic version of
them by e-mail? Even a generic version would be ok. This way, I can sign
and return you the paper copy as soon as I get it.
Cheers,
Nic.
On Thu, 2006
15 matches
Mail list logo