Re: LLVM copyright?

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Lattner
On Mar 23, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote: As I just sent in my Gelato abstract Oh right, I have to do that too! :) (at which you and I will be presenting talks about different approaches to link-time optimization in GCC), I was wondering what the status of the LLVM copyright assign

LLVM copyright?

2006-03-23 Thread Mark Mitchell
Chris -- As I just sent in my Gelato abstract (at which you and I will be presenting talks about different approaches to link-time optimization in GCC), I was wondering what the status of the LLVM copyright assignment is. Has there been progress on that front? Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSour

gcc-4.0-20060323 is now available

2006-03-23 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20060323 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20060323/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

RE: sibcall, sibcall_pop, sibcall_value and sibcall_pop_value named patterns not documented

2006-03-23 Thread Dave Korn
On 21 March 2006 20:21, Dave Korn wrote: > At least as far as I have been able to find, there's no mention of these > anywhere in any version of the internals manual. > Since I have only deduced the existence of these patterns from stumbling > across HAVE_sibcall etc. in calls.c, I won't imme

Working with c

2006-03-23 Thread Laura Tardivo
Hello, my name is Laura and I need to know where I could find or download the oldest version of de "C" compiler. I look forward to hearing from you. -- Departamento de Computaciòn Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto -Córdoba - Argentina

Re: Ada subtypes and base types

2006-03-23 Thread Duncan Sands
On Thursday 23 March 2006 17:14, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > > > > Well - we could hack a new type attribute to specify min/max values... > > Or maybe try to using C++ instead since C++ rules for enums are > different > than C :). Well,

Cross Compiling Ada to Netware using GNAT

2006-03-23 Thread Darryl Bleau
Been so far unsuccessful in doing this, was hoping someone could help. I tried to emulate our current cross compile method (C to NLM) for Ada but something doesn't seem to be working. Currently, we cross compile our C programs using gcc and link everything into an elf32-i386 object file. Then, we

Re: Ada subtypes and base types

2006-03-23 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mar 23, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: Well - we could hack a new type attribute to specify min/max values... Or maybe try to using C++ instead since C++ rules for enums are different than C :). -- Pinski

Re: Ada subtypes and base types

2006-03-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On 3/23/06, Jeffrey A Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 10:40 +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Jeff, this seems to work nicely - thanks again. I still see a bunch > > of suboptimal range calculations in the Ada code I'm looking at, but these > > now just coming from having ev

Re: Ada subtypes and base types

2006-03-23 Thread Jeffrey A Law
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 10:40 +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jeff, this seems to work nicely - thanks again. I still see a bunch > of suboptimal range calculations in the Ada code I'm looking at, but these > now just coming from having everything initialised to VR_VARYING rather than > [TYPE_MIN, T

"--param max-cselib-memory-location[s]" misspelled in GCC manual

2006-03-23 Thread Philipp Classen
Hi, I think the optimization parameter "max-cselib-memory-location" documented in the section 3.10 should be called "max-cselib-memory-locations". (The last 's' is missing.) Bye, Philipp Claßen

Re: Ada subtypes and base types

2006-03-23 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Which ones? PR tree-optimization/26797. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Ada subtypes and base types

2006-03-23 Thread Duncan Sands
On Thursday 23 March 2006 11:31, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > Hi Jeff, this seems to work nicely - thanks again. > > Well, this has introduced 3 regressions in the ACATS testsuite on x86/x86-64. Which ones? Ciao, Duncan.

Re: Ada subtypes and base types

2006-03-23 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Hi Jeff, this seems to work nicely - thanks again. Well, this has introduced 3 regressions in the ACATS testsuite on x86/x86-64. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Ada subtypes and base types

2006-03-23 Thread Duncan Sands
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21:59, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:14 +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > > > Hi Jeff, on the subject of seeing through typecasts, I was playing around > > with VRP and noticed that the following "if" statement is not eliminated: > > > > int u (unsigned char

Re: Can't build gcc version 4.2.0 20060311 (experimental) on sparc/sparc64 linux

2006-03-23 Thread David S. Miller
From: "Christian Joensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:25:43 +0100 > On 3/23/06, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Christian Joensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:05:54 +0100 > > > > > The problem is this: > > > > > > file .libs/barrier.o

Re: Can't build gcc version 4.2.0 20060311 (experimental) on sparc/sparc64 linux

2006-03-23 Thread Christian Joensson
On 3/23/06, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Christian Joensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:05:54 +0100 > > > The problem is this: > > > > file .libs/barrier.o > > .libs/barrier.o: ELF 32-bit MSB relocatable, SPARC32PLUS, V8+ > > Required, version 1 (SYSV), n

Re: Can't build gcc version 4.2.0 20060311 (experimental) on sparc/sparc64 linux

2006-03-23 Thread Christian Joensson
oops, this went to gcc-patches, should have gone here... On 3/23/06, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This was on > > Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0b2 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u: > > binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5.sparc > bison-2.1-1.1.sparc > dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch > expect