FAIL: gcc.dg/sparc-ret.c scan-assembler

Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0b2 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u: binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5.sparc bison-1.875c-2.sparc dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch expect-5.42.1-1.sparc gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc.sparc glibc-2.3.3-99.sparcv9 glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc

Re: fold_build1 (NOP_EXPR, ...) vs. fold_build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, ...)

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Richard Guenther wrote: > It looks like it is safe to exchange both of them (the first one for sure) > to fold_convert (...) due to the fact that fold_unary handles NOP_EXPR > the same way than CONVERT_EXPR apart from cases that look like oversights, > ... > In fact, I remember

Documentation for 4.0.2

Hi, Any chances that the GCC Internals documentation will be updated any time soon? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/ There have been a lot of changes in GCC and it's hard to figure out the code by reading the old documentation and the new incomplete 4.0.2 draft. Thx. Domagoj -- ___

ARM spurious load

The following code snippet produces code that loads a register, r5, from memory, but never uses the value. The code is correct though, so not a major issue. In addition, it never uses r3 or r12, which are "free" registers, in that they don't have to be saved by the callee. For a one line function t

gcc-4.0-20051201 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.0-20051201 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20051201/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Declaration of flags in 4.0.2

"Domagoj Flanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Where're these flags defined in 4.0.2? > > flag_syntax_only > flag_mudflap They are defined in the file common.opt. Ian

Declaration of flags in 4.0.2

Hi, Where're these flags defined in 4.0.2? flag_syntax_only flag_mudflap "grep -inr ." in the source root didn't return any declarations. Thx. Domagoj -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/

Re: [C++] cp_token::type and cp_token::keyword

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > In cp/parser.c:cp_parser_declaration(), we have the following code > > /* Try to figure out what kind of declaration is present. */ > token1 = *cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer); > > if (token1.type != CPP_EOF) > token2 = *cp_lexer_peek_nth_token (parser->le

Re: new c++ restrictions?

Jack Howarth wrote: For the last few months, gcc 4.1 has had problems compling the following code in posRMSDPot.cc in xplor-nih... without a full test case we have no clue. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell:: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]::

Re: MS1 backend not listed in backends.html

> I think the line should be > + ms1 | S F B p g bd Argh, I misread "does not" for "does". Ok, committing the following. Index: backends.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/backends.html,v retrieving revision

Re: MS1 backend not listed in backends.html

Aldy Hernandez wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:18:20PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: Hi Aldy, The MS1 backend is not listed in http://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html. Could you please add it? This is what I have. Nathan, how does this look to you? I think the line should be + ms1 | S

Re: MS1 backend not listed in backends.html

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:18:20PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hi Aldy, > > The MS1 backend is not listed in http://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html. > Could you please add it? This is what I have. Nathan, how does this look to you? Index: backends.html

Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Argh... I've grepped all over my harddrive, but can't find it. But > I *am* sure I sent a mail to rms explaining the whole thing, and he > responded positively. Perhaps he can remember the conversation? Thanks for looking. I can ask him, if that route looks best. At th

Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

BTW, here is the original thread I had started: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-04/msg00695.html > > There was a thread discussing all this, when I was interested in doing > > the work. I mailed rms directly, and he said it was ok to use the > > glibc bits in gcc regardless of the LGPL/GPL dispar

Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

Aldy Hernandez wrote: > There was a thread discussing all this, when I was interested in doing > the work. I mailed rms directly, and he said it was ok to use the > glibc bits in gcc regardless of the LGPL/GPL disparity. Do you happen to have a pointer, or a copy of that message? If that route

MS1 backend not listed in backends.html

Hi Aldy, The MS1 backend is not listed in http://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html. Could you please add it? Gr. Steve

Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Henderson wrote: >> The glibc bits handle ieee quad format, whereas I don't believe >> that Torbajorn's does. I don't recall if Torbajorn's code allows >> for emulation of all rounding modes or exception bits. > I believe i

Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:42:36PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> RTH is listed as the author of a lot of those bits, so perhaps he knows >> more? > The glibc bits handle ieee quad format, whereas I don't believe > that Torba

Re: Help required - ICE in GCC for my target

> Could you please guide where I can look into You're going to have to just debug it.

fold_build1 (NOP_EXPR, ...) vs. fold_build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, ...)

It looks like it is safe to exchange both of them (the first one for sure) to fold_convert (...) due to the fact that fold_unary handles NOP_EXPR the same way than CONVERT_EXPR apart from cases that look like oversights, f.i. /* Convert (T1)((T2)X op Y) into (T1)X op Y, for pointer types T1

weakref and static

The 'weakref' attribute is defined in terms of aliases. Now, if the user writes void foo(void) { } void bar(void) __attribute__((alias ("foo"))); then that causes 'bar' to be defined. Other translation units can use 'bar'. If 'weakref' is to define an alias, it should behave the same way. Un

[4.0 Regression + Patch] PR23282

Hi, PR23282 is a wrong code generation bug that shows up in trivial C code (see comment 2) at -O1. Since a few weeks, there has been a small patch attached to the PR (tested on mainline/4.1 since june see PR22442) that also fixes the problem for 4.0 (I tested _4_0_1_release). I think that th

GCC-3.4.6 status

Hi, gcc-3_4-branch is open again for regression-fix patches only. Thanks, -- Gaby

Re: SVN Problem?

svn switch --relocate {svn://,svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc Thanks. I doubt I would have come up with that one on my own! :-) Oh, that's just shell expansion for svn switch --relocate svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc \ svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc BTW Dan, though Jeff did not see it

successfully built and installed GCC version 4.0.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Debian Sarge 3.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 successfully built and installed GCC version 4.0.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Debian Sarge 3.1 all languages enabled # ./config.guess i686-pc-linux-gnu # ./gcc-4.0.2 -v Es werden eingebaute Spezifikationen verwendet. Ziel: i686-pc-linux-gnu Konfiguriert

gcc-4.2-20051201 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.2-20051201 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20051201/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

RE: Help required - ICE in GCC for my target

Hi Delorie Thank you very much for your reply. I have made the changes as you have mentioned, but I am getting same error. Could you please guide where I can look into Thanking you in advance Regards Shrirang Khisti KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. -Original Message- From: DJ Delorie