Re: Update on GCC moving to svn

2005-10-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:47:19PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: >Angela, you said you had a good solution to the restricted shell problem >(IE the need to allow both cvs server and svnserve to run). ? I wrote a script which seems to work for providing a restricted shell. Does Angela have something

Re: Questions about comparison insns in mips.md

2005-10-08 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Eric Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the help. Since ARM has condition codes, I'm wondering why it uses > a psuedo register internally to represent things that use or set the > condition codes? > I think it should use CPSR directly. ARM actually does use the CPSR directly. See CC

cross build gcc 4.0/4.1 fail

2005-10-08 Thread Cauchy Song
cross building latest gcc under latest debian sarge x86 box: gcc-3.4-branch: success: --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-mingw32 --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 success: --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-mingw32 --target=i686-pc-mingw32 --enable-languages=c,c

Re: Questions about comparison insns in mips.md

2005-10-08 Thread Eric Fisher
08 Oct 2005 10:40:40 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor : > Eric Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Who can explains for me about the comparison insns in mips.md. > > Look at the documentation for the bCOND instruction patterns. > > > One question, why there is only define_expand patterns but no

Jikes RVM

2005-10-08 Thread Jeffrin
hello all, One of my Friend wants to do a project as a feature enhancement on Jikes RVM (http://jikesrvm.sourceforge.net) can you all suggest a feature enhancement ? -- Jeffrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com

development

2005-10-08 Thread Bill Cunningham
Ok since I'm very new to this are there any switches when compiling this source for development purposes? Bill

Update on GCC moving to svn

2005-10-08 Thread Daniel Berlin
Okay, well, i've got the svn mailer config setup okay, and tested to make sure it posts the right messages to the right mailing lists for the right dirs ViewCVS is now up on an old test repo at http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs and working okay. Thus, i'm going to put an updated repo on gcc.gnu.org on

gcc-4.1-20051008 is now available

2005-10-08 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20051008 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20051008/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 CVS branch with the following options: -D2005-10-08 17:43 UTC You'll

Re: Questions about comparison insns in mips.md

2005-10-08 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Eric Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Who can explains for me about the comparison insns in mips.md. Look at the documentation for the bCOND instruction patterns. > One question, why there is only define_expand patterns but no > define_insn. Because the gcc model for comparison inst

Re: Char *Foo = "ABC" or Char Foo[] = "ABC"" ?

2005-10-08 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:39:46AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > That said, some ABIs over-align arrays, and so you might get more > padding with arrays than raw strings. But it'll be less than the > size of an extra pointer variable. Plus constant merging will not happen (at least not unless

Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC

2005-10-08 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Generic but you might want to start by trying to define a type | > system first. | > | | Actually, we shouldn't be writing out any of them, at least in their | current form. | | (IE it shouldn't be pickled trees) I strongly agree. -- Gaby

Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy

2005-10-08 Thread Richard Kenner
You keep saying "If we had done this by creating new types, it would be a mess", but what we have *now* is a mess. I seriously doubt the "mess" created by having new types for objects of new sizes would be greater than what we have now. I disagree. The mess we have right now is

Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC

2005-10-08 Thread Richard Guenther
On 10/8/05, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Generic but you might want to start by trying to define a type > > system first. Why not gimple? > Actually, we shouldn't be writing out any of them, at least in their > current form. > > (IE it shouldn't be pickled trees) Or even dump SSA

Questions about comparison insns in mips.md

2005-10-08 Thread Eric Fisher
Hello, Who can explains for me about the comparison insns in mips.md. One question, why there is only define_expand patterns but no define_insn. Supposed that I have a comparison instruction say 'cmp %1, %2', should I implement define_insn patterns for comparison insns? Here is a pattern fr