its a pitty ms are not apple, its been something I have been thinking
of for a while even though they are a bit expensive.
I have to much to switch to mac invested in windows, though if I did
it all over again I'd have mac, maybe linux, and maybe some old
probably semi alegal windows for gaming
some apple concepts
of screen navigation, so who knows. Maybe ms will continue it.
- Original Message - From: "Trouble"
To: "Gamers Discussion list"
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] Implementing graphic in games with and
withoutsidedassis
its a pitty ribbons can't be turned off to in such things as office.
Yes the i3 my brother uses is cool and yeah I only use it to keep it
updated and don't have to
do much bar search for things but then its not mine.
If it was I think I would have done some major system fiddling ages
ago thoug
ist"
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] Implementing graphic in games with and
withoutsidedassistence
Don't think they will listen, because the next move Microsoft is going
towards is touch screen and forget the keyboard.
Just like with them sloughing off a
Don't think they will listen, because the next move Microsoft is
going towards is touch screen and forget the keyboard.
Just like with them sloughing off accessibility.
At 10:56 PM 4/20/2011, you wrote:
Yep.
When I bought my first xp desktop in 2005, I got a middle of the
road graphics card on
Hi Dark,
Definitely. There are a lot of people who are turned off by the
high-end graphics and animation in Windows 7. Including me, because I
have to have a pretty high-end computer just to run the OS let alone
any apps. Then, because of all that 3d Windows Arrow interface that 3
GHZ system with
Yep.
When I bought my first xp desktop in 2005, I got a middle of the road
graphics card on the advice of the nice local place who were building my pc,
who told me that high end was only necessary to run uba 3D games, but low
end would drag down everything.
Now, as Tom said, the basic spec f
