> variable names and newlines with indentation, all of which count toward the
> limit (and certainly can be trimmed).
>
> Perhaps the size limit should be mentioned in the man page (or did I miss
> it?).
k a k @ c i s c o . c o m
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http:
Hello fellow FVWM users,
I have a pesky problem that I'm stumped by...
ImageMagick has a program called 'animate' that can be used to view an
animated gif file, e.g.:
animate /tmp/my_animated.gif
It opens with the title bar only and no window borders (I would like
for it
I'll ask the ImageMagick folks...
But to follow up with FVWM...
I thought FVWM could be configured to set a border width that would
overrule whatever the app wants.
For example, the WireShark network sniffer program has a "Follow TCP
Stream" window that normally refuses t
From: Velva Hibler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FVWM: 350% Gains Expected With CRHI, Monday skyline
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 18:31:15 -0400
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
sub menu or another menu? |
> +---+
No problem for me.
Debian 8.3
iceweasel 38.7.1esr-1~deb8u1
fvwm 1:2.6.5.ds-3
GI
--
Chemicals: Noxious substances from which modern foods are made.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:49:00AM +0200, Martin Cermak wrote:
> I like the current logo. But as long as fvwm is here as such, I'm
> fine with pretty much any logo for it ;)
Ditto; The logo can be a green polka dotted rabbit if you fancy. Just as
long as fvwm doesn't disappear
Apologies for "hijacking" this thread; I love fvwm and use it every day.
I have to confess that a small part of me fears that because of a silly
protocol change, fvwm may suddenly "not work", and the fvwm dev(s) might
no longer be interested...
Regardless, let me also add my
Hi Fvwm Users,
Does anyone use Debian/testing and have trouble running KDE5
applications? When I run them under fvwm I get no icons. KDE4
applications are fine...
Thanks,
GI
--
'Smith & Wesson' -- The original point and click interface.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:32:53PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:11:51AM -0700, elliot s wrote:
> > > take another look at the document, since it tells you how functions could
> > > be specified.
> >
> > I missed seeing the example, but it was as i thought.
> > A function
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:27:47PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:20:50PM -0400, lists-f...@useunix.net wrote:
> > Is it worth considering moving away from line-based processing for
> > entities like functions?
> >
> > Changing the example in the document to something like:
ying that they
> > aren't necessary?
>
> They're continuation markers. Lots of programs honour those when reading in
> files, as does FVWM at present, so this isn't anything new, and the point of
> using them is to allow people to improve readability.
>
> --
Happy New Year to all. (And a big thank you to the Fvwm Devs.)
GI
--
if (2.0 == 1.99963) printf('Pentium inside!\n');
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:11:53AM +0300, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
> I've lived with this problem since 2008. Or even earlier.
Ha ha. Me too! I even posted about this back in 2007 or so, but could
never fix it.
My work around was to launch Java applications (mainly Matlab) in their
own desktop.
Hi All,
I'm using fvwm 2.6.7 from Debian/stretch.
If I execute the command
Pick WindowStyle MiniIcon password.png
I get a full FVWM crash (and consequently an X server exit + lost work +
tears).
The problem is that the png file password.png (which I'm attaching,
and hoping i
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 09:46:35AM -0400, gi1242+f...@gmail.com wrote:
> The problem is that the png file password.png (which I'm attaching,
> and hoping it makes it past the list mail filters) is badly formed.
Oops. I forgot the attachment. Here it is now.
Best,
Gautam
--
A lot of money is t
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:21:50PM +0200, Martin Cermak wrote:
>> Can you please ensure FVWM has been built with debug symbols, and get
>> a backtrace from gdb?
>
> Reproduced with fvwm-2.6.8-2.fc29.x86_64
Yay, thanks! Now I don't have to download + compile... :)
GI
--
5
it looks like it's the WM's responsibility to notify SystemD of the idle
status. Does fvwm do this? (I start Fvwm from sddm, or directly via
startx from the text console.)
If anyone has it working and has any tips they can share that would be
appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
GI
--
Thanks. Indeed, xautolock will work for me.
Making Fvwm dependent on systemd would certainly be suboptimal.
Thanks,
GI
--
'Common' Proof Techniques:
26. Proof by appeal to intuition -- Cloud-shaped drawings frequently
help here.
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:08:56PM +0530, Mandar Mitra wrote:
> If you're running fvwm and using Zoom, can you please check if you can
> reproduce this problem?
I use Fvwm. The Zoom whiteboard or screen annotations do not work for me
either.
It works under KDE.
GI
--
The e-
t the whiteboard + screen annotations
that dont work under Fvwm, but work under other desktops...
GI
--
Two peanuts walk into a bar.
One was a salted.
Very cool, thanks! Is there an upgrade guide/list of changes since
Fvwm2? I couldn't find it on the website.
(I see that my current configuration will still work with fvwm3,
but I'm still slow to test it as it's critical for my daily work.)
GI
--
When an actress saw her first strands of gray ha
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 07:50:32PM +0530, Mandar Mitra wrote:
> Hmmm, I'm not sure what has changed, but the instructions I had written about
> earlier (from
> https://forum.manjaro.org/t/zoom-whiteboard-does-not-work/131178) seem to be
> working now. Specifically:
>
> 1. Start Zoom.
> 2. Run
Thanks! I'll give it a shot this weekend.
Been some 15 years of using fvwm now, so thanks for all your work!
GI
--
'Smith & Wesson' -- The original point and click interface.
/02/2024 à 04:28, hw a écrit :
On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 14:02 -0700, Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:25 PM hw wrote:
so is there finally a version that works for wayland?
No, fvwm only works with xorg and most likely won't be ported.
What are the differences between
On 07Nov12 08:05 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Key F8 A A Exec xmessage $[desk.n] $[page.nx] $[page.ny] $[w.id]
This works in 2.5.30, but not in 2.6.5
> Key F8 A A Exec xmessage $$[desk.n] $$[page.nx] $$[page.ny] $$[w.id]
This works in 2.5.30 and 2.6.5
On 05Dec13 11:00 +0100, lee wrote:
> | PipeRead 'for i in /bin/ls $HOME/.fvwm/*.fvwm; do echo Read $i; done'
>
> which seemed to read the contents of an executable file and tried to
> execute whatever it read as commands. That appears to be way too
> dangerous to use.
26 matches
Mail list logo
