On 26 May 2014 17:18, lee wrote:
> lee writes:
>
>> Thomas Adam writes:
>>
>>> So I don't want idle speculation or wonder to permeate the work I'm doing,
>>> the only thing FVWM will benefit from this will be bug-fixes, and I've
>>> already identified a few memory leaks. It's nice for FVWM in a
I found that setting up the monitors with xrandr then restarting fvwm
from the menu works rather well. So screen configuration is well
taken into account. OTOH, it seems that having fvwm pick it up
automatically would require major surgery. The setup is so not
dynamic it's not funny.
OG.
On
On 5 July 2014 16:05, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> I found that setting up the monitors with xrandr then restarting fvwm
> from the menu works rather well. So screen configuration is well
> taken into account. OTOH, it seems that having fvwm pick it up
> automatically would require major surgery.
