FVWM: fvwm and mvwm? How is fvwm?

2014-05-11 Thread Michael Treibton
Hi, I recently read this: https://plus.google.com/+ThomasAdamXteddy/posts/H5dV9UM7Pbe And wondered what the status of fvwm is for definite, especially now one of the main developers has abandoned it. What do others think? Michael

Re: FVWM: fvwm and mvwm? How is fvwm?

2014-05-11 Thread Stuart Longland
On 11/05/14 19:39, Michael Treibton wrote: > I recently read this: > > https://plus.google.com/+ThomasAdamXteddy/posts/H5dV9UM7Pbe > > And wondered what the status of fvwm is for definite, especially now > one of the main developers has abandoned it. > > What do others think? It worries me a bi

Re: FVWM: fvwm and mvwm? How is fvwm?

2014-05-11 Thread Thomas Funk
Stuart Longland wrote: > On 11/05/14 19:39, Michael Treibton wrote: >> I recently read this: >> >> https://plus.google.com/+ThomasAdamXteddy/posts/H5dV9UM7Pbe >> >> And wondered what the status of fvwm is for definite, especially now >> one of the main developers has abandoned it. >> >> What do oth

Re: FVWM: fvwm and mvwm? How is fvwm?

2014-05-11 Thread E Frank Ball III
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 02:28:19PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > > FVWM is still an active project as you can see it on the mailing lists > but it's true that there are many parts in the code which could be > removed but that's not so easy. FVWM is over 20 years old and many things > were grow

Re: FVWM: fvwm and mvwm? How is fvwm?

2014-05-11 Thread Michael . Grosser
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Mai 2014 um 18:57 Uhr > Von: "E Frank Ball III" > An: fvwm > Betreff: Re: FVWM: fvwm and mvwm? How is fvwm? > > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 02:28:19PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > > > > FVWM is still an active project as you can see it on the mailing lists > > but it's tru