hi,
is it possible to supply money, a donation, to the fvwm project?
if i did this, where would it go, to what purpose? would i be allowed
to say where it went?
Harry
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:53:05PM +, Harry portobello wrote:
> hi,
>
> is it possible to supply money, a donation, to the fvwm project?
Once upon a time it used to be so, but that was mostly an initiative of
Dominik Vogt, as far as I know.
Because FVWM is not an organisation and has no stru
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
>> # Bind some decors to the buttons at the left side
>> ButtonStyle 1 - Clear MwmDecorMenu
>> ButtonStyle 3 - Clear MwmDecorStick
>> ButtonStyle 5 - Clear MwmDecorLayer 6
>> ButtonStyle 7 - Clear MwmDecorLayer 4
>
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:17:29PM +0100, michael.gros...@gmx.de wrote:
>> But, the idea of a distribution like Debian is to get
>> stable software onto the computer by typing
>> "apt-get install something". Each exception I have to make
>> erodes the whole idea of a ready-to-u
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:41:03 +0100 (CET)
> Von: "Thomas Funk"
> An: "Michael Großer" , fvwm@fvwm.org
> Betreff: Aw: Re: FVWM: Why is Debian behind schedule regarding recent FVWM
>versions so much?
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > My decision is for sure now tha
>
> Hm.
> I remember when I did it last time that it was a lg
> odyssey finding out which libraries were needed, finding
> the libraries, finding other libraries from which the libraries
> depend and so on. For newbies, this was definitely not an
> acceptable way. The reason why I writ
On Monday, 23 January 2012 at 18:05, Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
> The last note is the debian package for some reason (I am still unsure
> why Manjo did this) has an epoch version and the package you made will
> not. Because of this epoch version the version in the debian repos
> 1:2.5.30 is considered
