Re: FVWM: spelling of "fvwm" vs. "Fvwm" vs. "FVWM"

2007-08-10 Thread Gautam Iyer
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:08:50AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > Should this resurface sometime again in the future, my offer is still > open. Just my 0.02c: I quite like the naming convention. Lower case binary with mixed case modules. And for some reason the issues pointed out with the documentat

Re: FVWM: spelling of "fvwm" vs. "Fvwm" vs. "FVWM"

2007-08-10 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On 09/08/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think opinions have been exchanged by now. So, who of the > > people who promote "FVWM" as fvwm's name is willing to do the > > following: > > > > * Rename *all* occurences i

Re: FVWM: spelling of "fvwm" vs. "Fvwm" vs. "FVWM"

2007-08-10 Thread Thomas Adam
On 10/08/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you have no idea of the extend of my efforts to keep > naming consistent in the source tree. Oh, I can well imagine it's a lot of work. But it's really only the documentation that would need changing if anything since: * Having a bin