Thomas Adam writes:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:15:21AM -0500, MK wrote:
>> Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that Thomas
>> has been interested previously, but did not get the application in or
>> did not qualify.
>>
>> I'm not familiar with the fvwm source, but it's be
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:15:21AM -0500, MK wrote:
> Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that Thomas
> has been interested previously, but did not get the application in or
> did not qualify.
>
> I'm not familiar with the fvwm source, but it's been my WM of choice
> for abou
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:18 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:15:21AM -0500, MK wrote:
> > Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that
> > Thomas has been interested previously, but did not get the
> > application in or did not qualify.
>
> I'm happy to ac
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:15:42 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 01:49:18PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > MK, I'd appreciate it if you'd search the mailing list archives for
> > the last time this was discussed, and to reference where I talked
> > about potential projects, etc.
>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 01:49:18PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:15:21AM -0500, MK wrote:
> > Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that Thomas
> > has been interested previously, but did not get the application in or
> > did not qualify.
>
> I'm happy
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:39:24AM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
> Thomas Adam writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:15:21AM -0500, MK wrote:
> >> Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that Thomas
> >> has been interested previously, but did not get the application in or
> >> did
Thomas Adam writes:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:15:21AM -0500, MK wrote:
>> Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that Thomas
>> has been interested previously, but did not get the application in or
>> did not qualify.
>
> I'm happy to act as both the main point of contact, a
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:15:21AM -0500, MK wrote:
> Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that Thomas
> has been interested previously, but did not get the application in or
> did not qualify.
I'm happy to act as both the main point of contact, and as a mentor.
Unfortunately
Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 22:15, MK:
> Hey gang. I'll be eligible for GSOC this year. I recall that Thomas
> has been interested previously, but did not get the application in or
> did not qualify.
>
> I'm not familiar with the fvwm source, but it's been my WM of choice
> for about a decade, I work a
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, Thomas Funk wrote:
> From: Thomas Funk
> Subject: Re: FVWM: Google Summer of Code 2011
> To: fvwm@fvwm.org, fvwm-work...@fvwm.org
> Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 10:34 AM
>
> >On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:27:31PM +, Thomas Adam
> wrote:
> >
David Chanters writes:
> On 14 March 2010 20:24, Thomas Adam wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:16:38PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> So I am going to raise this now, unlike last year where we only had a few
>>> days to come up with something.
>>
>> Alas, this year, it is not t
On 14 March 2010 20:24, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:16:38PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> So I am going to raise this now, unlike last year where we only had a few
>> days to come up with something.
>
> Alas, this year, it is not to be. Despite my best efforts, I
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:52:01 -0500
des...@verizon.net wrote:
> > I finally got some time to start to poking around in the code a
> > little bit this afternoon. I notice fvwm does not have a "devel"
> > mailing list
> > -- is this the appropriate place to start asking pesky source code
> > question
MK writes:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:01:15 +
> Thomas Adam wrote:
>> Well, I am no where near coming up with a list of proposals, so I
>> wouldn't get too enamoured with the TODO list. It's still very early
>> days, but I'll keep your name on my list.
>
> I finally got some time to start to
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:01:15 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> Well, I am no where near coming up with a list of proposals, so I
> wouldn't get too enamoured with the TODO list. It's still very early
> days, but I'll keep your name on my list.
I finally got some time to start to poking around in the co
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:57:17PM -0500, MK wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:01:15 +
> Thomas Adam wrote:
> > Well, I am no where near coming up with a list of proposals, so I wouldn't
> > get too enamoured with the TODO list. It's still very early days, but I'll
> > keep your name on my list
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:01:15 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> Well, I am no where near coming up with a list of proposals, so I wouldn't
> get too enamoured with the TODO list. It's still very early days, but I'll
> keep your name on my list.
Just to make sure, which TODO list are you referring to her
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:01:15 +
Thomas Adam wrote:
> Well, I am no where near coming up with a list of proposals, so I wouldn't
> get too enamoured with the TODO list. It's still very early days, but I'll
> keep your name on my list.
I'm sure it'll do as a place to start exploring the project
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:53:57AM -0500, MK wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:16:38 +
> Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > So I am going to raise this now, unlike last year where we only had a few
> > days to come up with something.
> >
> > Is there anyone here who's thinking of wantin
19 matches
Mail list logo
