On 24 February 2010 22:50, David Chanters wrote:
> On 23 February 2010 00:16, wrote:
>> Look at the TODO file in the source tree.
>
> i did this, and have some questions:
>
> - whats the update with the fvwm-convert2.6 script?
Functional, as far as I know. I have a patch kicking around to get
On 23 February 2010 00:16, wrote:
> Look at the TODO file in the source tree.
i did this, and have some questions:
- whats the update with the fvwm-convert2.6 script?
- according to the TODO file, the only thing remaining is this script?
whats outstanding with the convert2.6 script thats holdi
On 23 February 2010 11:11, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Which documentation? Something in the man page or larger volumes of
> text, such as random guides/tutorials which are floating around on the
> 'net? You might want to try and contribute to the FvwmWiki if it's
> nothing too specific and you feel yo
On 23 February 2010 11:08, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Ah, I really don't think I can say that I've done much -- I am not
> sure what you'd get out of me personally from some sort of interview,
> so I'll politely decline. :)
that is disappointing as i recall reading things from you on the
internet about
Hello --
On 21 February 2010 20:23, David Chanters wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've noticed a lot of activity with fvwm lately, and was wondering:
>
> - is there a way of improving documentation?
Which documentation? Something in the man page or larger volumes of
text, such as random guides/tutorials w
Hello --
On 23 February 2010 00:16, wrote:
> They're shy so I'll do a little promotion for them.
>
> Thomas Adam has been doing most of the recent development.
Ah, I really don't think I can say that I've done much -- I am not
sure what you'd get out of me personally from some sort of interview
On 23 February 2010 00:16, wrote:
> Submit patches.
Er, ok. i will try
>> - what's the roadmap for fvwm's future?
>> - when will fvwm 2.6 be released?
>> Is there a document to describe this?
>
> Look at the TODO file in the source tree.
i saw this, but is it accurate for the current dev work?
David Chanters writes:
> Hi all
>
> I've noticed a lot of activity with fvwm lately, and was wondering:
>
> - is there a way of improving documentation?
Submit patches.
> - what's the roadmap for fvwm's future?
> - when will fvwm 2.6 be released?
> Is there a document to describe this?
Look at
On 21 February 2010 20:23, David Chanters wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've noticed a lot of activity with fvwm lately, and was wondering:
>
> - is there a way of improving documentation?
> - what's the roadmap for fvwm's future?
> - when will fvwm 2.6 be released?
>
> Is there a document to describe this?
Hi all
I've noticed a lot of activity with fvwm lately, and was wondering:
- is there a way of improving documentation?
- what's the roadmap for fvwm's future?
- when will fvwm 2.6 be released?
Is there a document to describe this?
Also, i would like to offer the chance to interview some of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
