On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 08:48:57PM +, Harry portobello wrote:
> hi,
>
> On 2 September 2011 20:10, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> > This sounds promising - I can test it on monday and will report back then.
>
> i think i have similar problems to you - was this fixed in fvwm ever?
I fixed it i
hi,
On 2 September 2011 20:10, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> This sounds promising - I can test it on monday and will report back then.
i think i have similar problems to you - was this fixed in fvwm ever?
Harry
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:10:34PM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 20:56:15 schrieb Thomas Adam:
> > I've a fix here which seems to be working and will commit to CVS over the
> > weekend sometime.
> >
> This sounds promising - I can test it on monday and will rep
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 20:56:15 schrieb Thomas Adam:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 06:35:12AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> > Thomas Adam schrieb:
> > >Hi Chtistian,
> > >
> > >On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:54:37AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> > >>sorry for the late reply but I think
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 06:35:12AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> Thomas Adam schrieb:
> >Hi Chtistian,
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:54:37AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> >>sorry for the late reply but I think I found the culprit. There are
> >>some hacks in events.c/focus.c (focus_
Thomas Adam schrieb:
Hi,
On 1 September 2011 05:35, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
Thomas Adam schrieb:
Hi Chtistian,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:54:37AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
sorry for the late reply but I think I found the culprit. There are
some hacks in events.c/focus.c (focus_
Hi,
On 1 September 2011 05:35, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> Thomas Adam schrieb:
>>
>> Hi Chtistian,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:54:37AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>>>
>>> sorry for the late reply but I think I found the culprit. There are
>>> some hacks in events.c/focus.c (focus_for
Thomas Adam schrieb:
Hi Chtistian,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:54:37AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
sorry for the late reply but I think I found the culprit. There are
some hacks in events.c/focus.c (focus_force_refresh_focus and
refresh_focus) which seem to steal the focus from the focus p
Hi Chtistian,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:54:37AM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> sorry for the late reply but I think I found the culprit. There are
> some hacks in events.c/focus.c (focus_force_refresh_focus and
> refresh_focus) which seem to steal the focus from the focus proxy
> and therefo
Thomas Adam schrieb:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:58:07PM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
It looks like fvwm doesn't move the child window to the new position
when it gets reparented. E.g. when I move the child to 0,0 (screen
coords) before reparenting, then reparent it to the new window, the
ch
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:58:07PM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> It looks like fvwm doesn't move the child window to the new position
> when it gets reparented. E.g. when I move the child to 0,0 (screen
> coords) before reparenting, then reparent it to the new window, the
> child still is at
Am 01.06.2011 16:41, schrieb Thomas Adam:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
Hi,
I've a problem with xembed + qt (4.7,4.8) + fvwm2 (2.6.1). The attached
testcase works fine with kde.
How to reproduce:
- compile the two programs (qmake, make)
- start 'x11embedw
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a problem with xembed + qt (4.7,4.8) + fvwm2 (2.6.1). The attached
> testcase works fine with kde.
>
> How to reproduce:
> - compile the two programs (qmake, make)
> - start 'x11embedwidget'
> - start 'x11embedco
Hi,
I've a problem with xembed + qt (4.7,4.8) + fvwm2 (2.6.1). The attached
testcase works fine with kde.
How to reproduce:
- compile the two programs (qmake, make)
- start 'x11embedwidget'
- start 'x11embedcontainer ' whith the winid provided by x11embedwidget
On KDE I now see a red window and
14 matches
Mail list logo