Re: FVWM: Deprecating certain Fvwm* modules

2011-10-25 Thread roman
> There's no thought gone in to this and > will force users to learn things they didn't need to before. I am also > amazed that mail checking is now left up to the user when it's built > in to FvwmTaskBar already! fvwm and "don't need to learn" can't be used in one sentence. :)

FvwmCommand's Use (Was: Re: FVWM: Deprecating certain Fvwm* modules)

2011-10-25 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:06:42PM +0100, John Latham wrote: > Thomas: I use FvwmCommand alot. E.g. in my pdf lecture slides I can click on a > `button' which invokes a shell script, that uses FvwmCommand to change > desktop, sets up windows for a demo; waits for those windows to be closed and > us

Re: FVWM: Deprecating certain Fvwm* modules

2011-10-25 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:49:09PM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:18:34PM +0100, John Latham wrote: > > > Both FvwmComand and FvwmConsole are used a lot, so the goal is to replace= > > > them with a more verstile tool. They won't be removed until this tool is= > > > fu

Re: FVWM: Deprecating certain Fvwm* modules

2011-10-24 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:18:34PM +0100, John Latham wrote: > > Both FvwmComand and FvwmConsole are used a lot, so the goal is to replace= > > them with a more verstile tool. They won't be removed until this tool is= > > functional, been tested in many situations and people have had plenty of= >

Re: FVWM: Deprecating certain Fvwm* modules

2011-10-24 Thread John Latham
> Both FvwmComand and FvwmConsole are used a lot, so the goal is to replace= > them with a more verstile tool. They won't be removed until this tool is= > functional, been tested in many situations and people have had plenty of= > time to change their configs. As I thought, thanks. One thing t

Re: FVWM: Deprecating certain Fvwm* modules

2011-10-24 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 06:54:09PM +0100, Harry portobello wrote: > Hullo, > > On 24 October 2011 17:28, wrote: > > Harry portobello writes: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 22 October 2011 11:23, Thomas Adam wrote: > >>> Hello all, > >>> > >>> This has been a while coming since 2.6.0 was released.  

Re: FVWM: Deprecating certain Fvwm* modules

2011-10-24 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 07:18:20PM +0200, Bert Geens wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > This has been a while coming since 2.6.0 was released.  But I said at the > > time that since there was no longer ever going to be a split between > > stable/un