Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-20 Thread Thomas Adam
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:18:58PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > But I've tested it here iwth 0.10.9 -- the configure check discards that, as > > it falls below the miniumum version FVWM tries to use. > > It did not do so on my system. At t

Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-19 Thread Donald Allen
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:51:43AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:00:58AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: >> >> I just downloaded fvwm 2.6.3 and attempted to build

Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-19 Thread Thomas Adam
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:51:43AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:00:58AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > >> I just downloaded fvwm 2.6.3 and attempted to build it, which resulted in > >> > >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I

Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-19 Thread Thomas Adam
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:11:29PM -0700, elliot s wrote: > Speaking of 2.6.3, I'd found what I think is a bug ((Icon)TitleFormat > doesnt quite work like IndexedWindowName for one window) and reported > it to fvwm_workers, but i don't see it on that list's archive. If it > doesnt show up on the a

Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-18 Thread elliot s
Speaking of 2.6.3, I'd found what I think is a bug ((Icon)TitleFormat doesnt quite work like IndexedWindowName for one window) and reported it to fvwm_workers, but i don't see it on that list's archive. If it doesnt show up on the archive, does that mean that the msg didnt go thru?

Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-18 Thread Donald Allen
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Markus Hutmacher wrote: > Am 18.10.2011 17:51, schrieb Donald Allen: >> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Adam  wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:00:58AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: I just downloaded fvwm 2.6.3 and attempted to build it,

Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-18 Thread Markus Hutmacher
Am 18.10.2011 17:51, schrieb Donald Allen: On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:00:58AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: I just downloaded fvwm 2.6.3 and attempted to build it, which resulted in gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/include/freetype2 -

Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-18 Thread Donald Allen
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:00:58AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: >> I just downloaded fvwm 2.6.3 and attempted to build it, which resulted in >> >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I..  -I/usr/include/freetype2 >> -pthread -I/usr/include/librsvg-2.0

Re: FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-18 Thread Thomas Adam
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:00:58AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > I just downloaded fvwm 2.6.3 and attempted to build it, which resulted in > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I..  -I/usr/include/freetype2 > -pthread -I/usr/include/librsvg-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I

FVWM: 2.6.3 does not build

2011-10-18 Thread Donald Allen
I just downloaded fvwm 2.6.3 and attempted to build it, which resulted in gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I..  -I/usr/include/freetype2 -pthread -I/usr/include/librsvg-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/libpng14