Re: [OT] gnu/texinfo FVWM: mvwm - documentation

2014-08-26 Thread Bert Geens
Note that the following should not be taken as a plea for Fvwm to switch to TexInfo, I merely wanted to address some of the points Thomas made. Also note that I so far have no experience writing manpages nor TexInfo documents, so the above is purely a "client side" view on things. Thomas Adam wr

Re: [OT] gnu/texinfo FVWM: mvwm - documentation

2014-08-25 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:01:16PM -0500, Javier Fernandez wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 05:09:21PM -0600, Glenn Golden wrote: > > troff. Ancient perhaps, but even today, nothing beats it, IMO. (The > > TeX/latex > > family seems to be the only serious competitor, and colleagues over the > >

[OT] gnu/texinfo FVWM: mvwm - documentation

2014-08-25 Thread Javier Fernandez
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 05:09:21PM -0600, Glenn Golden wrote: > troff. Ancient perhaps, but even today, nothing beats it, IMO. (The > TeX/latex > family seems to be the only serious competitor, and colleagues over the years > familiar with with both seem to like them about equally.) What do you