On 30 January 2012 14:37, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> | > [...] There are several reasons as of why certain patches aren't
> | > accepted. Some of the patches affect areas of fvwm which in the long
> | > term goal should be replaced by modules. Others are unclean, and no
> | > one has been willing t
On 29 January 2012 08:08, Viktor Griph wrote:
> 2012/1/27 Harry portobello :
>> we have lots of patches like adding round corners and fluxbox handels
>> which have not been added to fvwm in long time - and why is this? why
>> isnt the maintainer - thomas - adding these?
&
hi,
is it possible to supply money, a donation, to the fvwm project?
if i did this, where would it go, to what purpose? would i be allowed
to say where it went?
Harry
hi,
2012/1/19 Jason Weber :
> Perhaps if you are open minded to tools that might be more effective
> at navigating
> windows than KDE or others do, I would also suggest taking a look at the
> FvwmProxy. It is a bit of a departure from the uncorrelated
> box-in-the-middle paradigm.
> It can handle
On 15 January 2012 20:32, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:06:04AM +0000, Harry portobello wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> i like the cvs version of fvwm and its been ages since the last release
>> [2.6.3]
>>
>> when will we see 2.6.4?
>
> When
hi,
i like the cvs version of fvwm and its been ages since the last release [2.6.3]
when will we see 2.6.4?
Harry
hi,
On 2 September 2011 20:10, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> This sounds promising - I can test it on monday and will report back then.
i think i have similar problems to you - was this fixed in fvwm ever?
Harry
hullo,
2011/10/30 Thomas Adam :
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:09:52PM +0000, Harry portobello wrote:
>> How do i do this with FvwmEvent? Thanks..
>
> Something like:
>
> DestroyFunc CountWindow
> AddToFunc CountWindow
> + I SetEnv WindowCount 0
> +
2011/10/29 Thomas Adam :
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:38:36PM +0200, Michael Großer wrote:
>> Thomas Adam wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:37:04PM +0100, Harry portobello wrote:
>> >> hullo,
>> >>
>> >> On 19 October 2011 18:51, el
hullo,
On 19 October 2011 18:51, elliot s wrote:
> Version 2.6.3:
> Previous versions only added the "(%t)" when there was a repeated name.
> The new code always adds it.
> I worked around the %t in add_window.c by checking if count was
> non-zero, tho that wouldnt kill the parens, which i change
On 20 October 2011 09:13, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:51:59AM -0700, elliot s wrote:
>> Version 2.6.3:
>> Previous versions only added the "(%t)" when there was a repeated name.
>> The new code always adds it.
>
> This is not a bug, but rather very much by deliberate design. T
DERSTANDING
>
> * (when two people are in a dispute, then the chance
> to elegantly solve the dispute increases dramatically
> when both persons try to explain and understand
> each other)
>
> - invite people to apply this principle when they
&
Hullo,
On 31 August 2011 09:06, Thomas Funk wrote:
> Hi Harry,
>
> as I red your email, my first impression was, to take up the cudgels for
> Thomas
> and will told you, that this posting hasn't belong on a public board. But
> anyway,
> you've done it, so I add one's two cents ...
>
> Yes, Thom
Hi all,
I've been reading the fvwm list for ages and recently subscribed
because of the article I'm currently writing - so although I've not
been on this list very long I feel as though I am no stranger to it;
mail archives can be a great thing, even more since a lot of them are
made public. :)
A
On 8 August 2011 01:13, Harry portobello wrote:
> Hello fvwmers,
>
> I'm writing an article for the Linux Magazine about fvwm. Given the
> rise of GNOME3 and Unity, there seems to be a trend of people turning
> away from their desktop environments for simpler solutions. I&
Hi,
On 8 August 2011 01:13, Harry portobello wrote:
> Hello fvwmers,
Does anyone have a contact addr for Thomas Adam? Ive been told he's
the person to talk to about fvwm's direction???
Thanks!
Harry
Hello fvwmers,
I'm writing an article for the Linux Magazine about fvwm. Given the
rise of GNOME3 and Unity, there seems to be a trend of people turning
away from their desktop environments for simpler solutions. I've been
using fvwm for many years and thought that since there's been a stable
rel
17 matches
Mail list logo
